OPINION | Who’s out there to replace Brad Johnson?

Derinyar

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,231
Reaction score
959
For this year out of the players that are likely options, for one or two games, I'll stick with Johnson. If we lose Romo for more than a game or two we are probably going to be in trouble for the season anyway.
 

THUMPER

Papa
Messages
9,522
Reaction score
61
ABQCOWBOY;2115768 said:
I think that I would also factor in experience into the evaluation. I mean, Brad Johnson and Craig Neil might both carry a 42 rating, or whatever it is, but Neil has played in 7 games. Johnson has won a Super Bowl. I think that probably counts for something.

On the other hand, age should count as well and Johnson is ancient.

In fact if age isn't a factor then I could throw my hat into the ring. I'll be 50 next month but I can still throw accurately about as far as Johnson can. I'd even play for rookie minimum. :D
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
I like the idea of signing Leftwich or Culpepper simply because they both have starting experience and should be able to weather the storm better than Johson if Romo happens to go out for any length of time. With the weapons we have on offense, it shouldn't be hard for these guys to find targets.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
THUMPER;2115813 said:
On the other hand, age should count as well and Johnson is ancient.

In fact if age isn't a factor then I could throw my hat into the ring. I'll be 50 next month but I can still throw accurately about as far as Johnson can. I'd even play for rookie minimum. :D


I don't disagree. If you want to call it age, that's fine with me. Either way, it has to be evaluated into the equation.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
DallasEast;2115781 said:
Like I stated in the original post, the criteria I used is for evaluating draft prospects only. :cunning: Seriously though, I did consider including player experience, but after seeing how Brad Johnson's overwhelming experience literally count as nothing by some forum members, I had decided against it. My personal bad, I guess. :eek::


I would not call it bad. I would just consider it along with the other areas of evaluation. As Thumper pointed out in his post, experience can also be a negative if you view it as to much age. It swings both ways.
 

starfrombirth

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,087
Reaction score
1,419
sago1;2115610 said:
No way do I want Bartel in as Romo's backup. Would like to have younger backup behind Romo & maybe in a few years Bartel could become a good backup. But do you really think Bartel could come into a game this year that we leading in & even maintain that lead? I don't unless we plan to hand the ball off to our RBs on every play. If Bartel's our backup this year, we'd lose every single game he played in & he'd lose all his confidence.

Moore did in his rookie year for Carolina so why not Bartel in his second year?
 

Romo2Dez4six

Touchdown!!!!
Messages
2,022
Reaction score
13
the only bad part is that if there was going to be a change it would have been done by now:rolleyes:
 
Top