buybuydandavis
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 24,933
- Reaction score
- 21,898
If they're allocating snaps based on salary, they're already doomed.
Crawford and his contract are already sunk costs. One initial mistake, compounded by an immediate restructure which locked them into the deal for years. But to further compound that mistake by forcing him onto the field ahead of better options would be criminal.
He's a good player and great team guy, but he's got absolutely zero business lining up at the right defensive end position. He was put out there last year because Mayowa couldn't maintain his responsibilities to stop the run, Tapper got hurt yet again, and because Taco simply wasn't ready. In 2018, there's no reason why he should be forced out there again.
My understanding is that Crawford *wants* to be at RDE. Which, I agree, makes no sense. Last year, the whole dline seemed perversely lined up, and Crawford the most. I wanted to see what he could do at 3tech when finally healthy. You know, the position we paid him all that money for. But instead, we put our most lumbering dlineman with the least bend at RDE.
They shouldn't allocate snaps based on salary, they should allocate salary based on snaps. Crawford's *salary* this year is not a sunk cost. I think he's a good player, but given what we have at RDE, I don't want to play him a lot of snaps, to the point where what he brings on those limited snaps just isn't worth his salary. I want Taco, Gregory, and Armstrong to play.
