Our D has allowed an average of 33 ppg; It is unsustainable

Went right over your head. No surprise there.
Actually your statement

"A real GM would have depth at 2 to 3 levels at every position. A real GM would be wheeling and dealing draft picks and players to fill gaps. Right?"

It is not hard to understand it is just ridiculous.

But have at it.
 
Actually your statement

"A real GM would have depth at 2 to 3 levels at every position. A real GM would be wheeling and dealing draft picks and players to fill gaps. Right?"

It is not hard to understand it is just ridiculous.

But have at it.
Think about it. Using sarcasm to drive home a point to the 'real GM' forever crybabies.
 
it is unsustainable , IF OUR OFFENSE CANT OUTSCORE THEM .

i am hopeful that the most expensive player can score more than 33 per game .
 
33 ppg.
What this means is our offence has to put up an average of 34 points each game to win.

No offence should work under this pressure.

Eberflus must go! His secondary coaches must go!
Our D reeks!
To wit:
164 yards rushing by the Pack?!?!
337 receiver yards by the Pack?!?!

I am Dak's biggest critic, but the lad deserves a break from our defence. He should not have an uphill battle of scoring at least 34 points a game.
Our anemic defence will keep us out of the playoffs!
Get rid of the asinine penalties and maybe, just maybe the high average of points given up will drop by 7-10 points. If the D can get the numbers down around 20 - 24 then I like our chances to win more than we lose.
 
I mean I can see trading Hendrickson but I don’t think they are in position to talk future with all the injuries Burrow keeps gettting. They are 2-2 they need to stay afloat until Burrow gets back. Plus they need to keep Chase and Higgins happy and right now at least Chase isn’t. They suffer when Burrow is out.
They need to stop w/ the Kyle Shanahan downfield passing attack. Gets your QB killed. Purdy is out also.
 
Our players, as a whole, aren't great. But they aren't this bad. It's the scheme. This group was built for a different scheme.
You mean the group that was 28th last year and lost Parsons/Lewis/Golston/Kendricks isn't that bad? Exactly how are you figuring this?
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,592
Messages
14,547,111
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top