our new safety

[jblaze2004]

anyone tired of seeing sensy play like he is wearing a skirt? This guy would bring fear back in dallas secondary/ defense period. No more sitting back and waiting on the tackle this guy attacks. He plays with alot of SWAGG and he looks to hurt someone. We all know our defense needs more SWAGG. We need someone that will not back down and will set the tone with bone crushing hits and good play.

[youtube]j2sLAI2bhAQ[/youtube]

[youtube]yMVXXAF0u64[/youtube]

 

[supercowboy8]

I like vcarro and Cyprien better but swearinger is my number 4
I would be happy with him in the 3rd

 

[JDSTAR]

My #1.

 

[supercowboy8]

You do know that everyonlooks great in highlight videos. They never show their low lights.

 

[jblaze2004]

if he is availible in the 3rd thats what makes this sweet. we can go de/dt/og/ot in the first 2 rounds and then get a safety that can play in the 3rd hopefully.

 

[JDSTAR]

You do know that everyonlooks great in highlight videos. They never show their low lights.

So you denote the player because he has a highlight video?

 

[jblaze2004]

So you denote the player because he has a highlight video?

I just paided him no mine. I guess he wanted me to post a lowlight video of someone. Im not saying we should take him with our first rounder. He isn't that good of a prospect coming out of college but he has tools, that's why I said 3rd rounder at best right now.

 

[JDSTAR]

I just paided him no mine. I guess he wanted me to post a lowlight video of someone. Im not saying we should take him with our first rounder. He isn't that good of a prospect coming out of college but he has tools, that's why I said 3rd rounder at best right now.

Oh no, didn't mean him as a 1st rounder; meant of him as the number 1 value pick at his position. I would take him in the 3rd over Vacarro in the 2.

 

[jblaze2004]

Oh no, didn't mean him as a 1st rounder; meant of him as the number 1 value pick at his position. I would take him in the 3rd over Vacarro in the 2.

oh naw I didn't mean you. I meant they guy who said everyone looks better in a highlight video or whatever. lol. so what video should I have posted?

I know swearing has flaws but he also has pretty good physical tools that hopefully with nfl coaching he can get better.

 

[funkytown]

I like his game, but he's a walking 15 yard penalty.

All that "swagg" will get him so many penalties in the NFL (No Fun League). He likes to get in peoples face after tackles, which I actually like, but that will draw flags.

He likes to lead with his helmet alot too, thats even more penalties.

 

[Rack]

I see a lot of PA TD passes given up, penalties, and missed tackles in that guy's career.

I'd rather have Cyprien.

 

[lostar2009]

You do know that everyonlooks great in highlight videos. They never show their low lights.

I know some people do not understand what a highlight video is..

 

[Rack]

I know some people do not understand what a highlight video is..

I was actually surprised a lot of those plays made it into the "Highlight Video".

It must have been too short so they added "Ho hum" plays to make it look like he did more.

 

[IAmLegend]

This guys will also bring a lot of late hit penalties and and head-hunting penalties too. Not to mention he's not a Garrett kind of guy. I'd say it's a long shot.

 

[Rack]

What's his measurable? He looks like he's got size, maybe he could play OLB (in a 43, not a 34).

 

[supercowboy8]

So you denote the player because he has a highlight video?

No but I have seen him play, I watch every sec game. He does have issues. I think he playa to close to the line to much and not enough back in zone which is what kiffin uses in his system. I like him but just keep in mind that everyone looks good in their highlights. I have seen swearinger makes mistakes and look awful.

If you can watch the UT game, Patterson made him look bad a few times and showed he was looking for the hit and was out of position for the ball.

 

[jobberone]

He's not the kind of guy I'd want on my team. And he's not a cover safety IMO. With the current rules there is no need for a Roy Williams type player. I don't discount the experience of a safety but I'd look for big corners to play safety. Your safeties need to be as good as your number 3-4 corner and be able to tackle.

 

[tm1119]

He's not the kind of guy I'd want on my team. And he's not a cover safety IMO. With the current rules there is no need for a Roy Williams type player. I don't discount the experience of a safety but I'd look for big corners to play safety. Your safeties need to be as good as your number 3-4 corner and be able to tackle.

I just watched a super bowl with Marcus Pollard and Dashon Goldson playing safety. 2 guys who don't cover well at all, but are an intimidating hitting presence. That style is not dead in the NFL, just on our soft defense. Not to mention twhat comparing Swearinger to Roy Williams is just way off. He is a much more fluid athlete than Williams was.

 

[supercowboy8]

I just watched a super bowl with Marcus Pollard and Dashon Goldson playing safety. 2 guys who don't cover well at all, but are an intimidating hitting presence. That style is not dead in the NFL, just on our soft defense. Not to mention twhat comparing Swearinger to Roy Williams is just way off. He is a much more fluid athlete than Williams was.

And how many times did the ravens go deep, several times.

 

[jobberone]

I just watched a super bowl with Marcus Pollard and Dashon Goldson playing safety. 2 guys who don't cover well at all, but are an intimidating hitting presence. That style is not dead in the NFL, just on our soft defense. Not to mention twhat comparing Swearinger to Roy Williams is just way off. He is a much more fluid athlete than Williams was.

I've watched him closely and hear what goes on with him. I'm betting he's off our board. And while I'll give you he's more 'fluid' than RW he's not a cover safety at the NFL level.