Owens meets with Broncos officials... No Cowboys?

[SupermanXx]

Parcells has one of the biggest egos in football...

let's see... does Vinny Testaverde do ANYTHING for the betterment of the team? I don't want to talk about it.

 

[BigDFan5]

the Eagles front office are notorious for being a bunch of cheap skates

look no further than Michael Westbrook... a multi-purpose back who's pretty much the only reason they have any semblance of a rushing/pass-threat attack... and they low ball the guy

he's a great guy off the field as well

whatever... to hell with them

LOL The Eagles gave him over 10 million dollars for 2 seasons and he was scheduled for another 8 this year. So 18 mill in 3 years is cheap?


And Westbrook got a 25 million contract with between 9-10 mill bonus yeah sure lowballed him


TO has destroyed 2 teams not just Philly. So what was his excuse in San Fran? were the cheap too?

 

[SupermanXx]

LOL The Eagles gave him over 10 million dollars for 2 seasons and he was scheduled for another 8 this year. So 18 mill in 3 years is cheap?


And Westbrook got a 25 million contract with between 9-10 mill bonus yeah sure lowballed him


TO has destroyed 2 teams not just Philly. So what was his excuse in San Fran? were the cheap too?

honestly I had forgotten about that.. but initially they were low balling him. thank God for nifty agents, I guess.

 

[BigDFan5]

Parcells has one of the biggest egos in football...

let's see... does Vinny Testaverde do ANYTHING for the betterment of the team? I don't want to talk about it.

But did playing 2 guys who were not ready in a meaningless game do anything for them AKA the team in the future?

 

[BigDFan5]

honestly I had forgotten about that.. but initially they were low balling him. thank God for nifty agents, I guess.

No actually that was their original offer. The agents rejected it and then later realized they were not going to get more because of the dilluted RB market so they took the original deal

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Parcells has one of the biggest egos in football...

um, he's a coach

let's see... does Vinny Testaverde do ANYTHING for the betterment of the team? I don't want to talk about it.

yes, win games, we would have been lucky to win 2 games with Henson or Romo as our QB, with the talent of this team, which sucked arse

 

[SupermanXx]

But did playing 2 guys who were not ready in a meaningless game do anything for them AKA the team in the future?

did playing a meaningless QB (43 years old, done for) in a meaningless game help at all though, dude?

I mean, if the game was meaningless, as you say.. Romo or Henson gaining SOME game experience would have been semi-meaningful...

at least more meaningful than playing a 83 year old *******

 

[SupermanXx]

No actually that was their original offer. The agents rejected it and then later realized they were not going to get more because of the dilluted RB market so they took the original deal

then maybe my Westbrook angle was completely off... ****** I could have sworn there were talks of him not getting that big contract though..

oh well.

bottom line: :iggles:

 

[Bob Sacamano]

did playing a meaningless QB (43 years old, done for) in a meaningless game help at all though, dude?

I mean, if the game was meaningless, as you say.. Romo or Henson gaining SOME game experience would have been semi-meaningful...

at least more meaningful than playing a 83 year old *******

a game of experience is semi-meaningful?

....

:laugh2:

no wait

:laugh1:

wait, wait

:laugh2: :laugh1:

ahhhhhhh, good one

 

[BigDFan5]

did playing a meaningless QB (43 years old, done for) in a meaningless game help at all though, dude?

I mean, if the game was meaningless, as you say.. Romo or Henson gaining SOME game experience would have been semi-meaningful...

at least more meaningful than playing a 83 year old *******

Yes playing a 43 year old QB did help by not throwing guys into the game who should not have been on the field.

What does 1 game accomplish experience wise?

 

[Bob Sacamano]

what's so funny you idiot?

um

I should be the one laughing at your *** for thinking that playing the idiot BallsackVerde during a blowout was more useful than getting our young QB's experience... Jesus

that is what's so funny, this mindset above, which is ridiculous, because 1 game experience is just that, 1 game, big whoop

 

[Bob Sacamano]

What does 1 game accomplish experience wise?

OH, OH, ME, ME...

1 game

OH NO! we're robbing them of important EXPERIENCE!! how are they ever going to make up for that 1 game?!!

 

[SupermanXx]

Yes playing a 43 year old QB did help by not throwing guys into the game who should not have been on the field.

What does 1 game accomplish experience wise?

there is no specific mathematical formula that I can appy to give you an answer to your question

but it ultimately comes down to either wasting time with an 80 year old moron, or at least gaining some insight into the future with your younger QB's

I mean seriously. which stance are you taking here? are you Vinny's father or something?

the idiot cost us more games and did so while being 42 years old and foolish-looking

we knew what the idiot brought to the table. fast forward to now, and who the hell knows what's gonna happen if Bledsoe goes down

..well I guess we can always call on Vinny! b/c like wine, he gets better with age!!!!

 

[Bob Sacamano]

there is no specific mathematical formula that I can appy to give you an answer to your question

but it ultimately comes down to either wasting time with an 80 year old moron, or at least gaining some insight into the future with your younger QB's

I mean seriously. which stance are you taking here? are you Vinny's father or something?

the idiot cost us more games and did so while being 42 years old and foolish-looking

we knew what the idiot brought to the table. fast forward to now, and who the hell knows what's gonna happen if Bledsoe goes down

ok, tell me, what do you think Henson or ROmo would have shown you in that 1 game?

but here's what I think, probably what Parcells already knew about them...

they aren't ready! shoot, Henson showed us that in ONE...HALF of football, you think he was going to miraculously get ready 5 games later?

btw, you need to get over Vinny man, he's gone, it's over

 

[BigDFan5]

but it ultimately comes down to either wasting time with an 80 year old moron, or at least gaining some insight into the future with your younger QB's

What insight do you gain from one game? I mean Henson played 2 1/2 quarters and people think he is a bust. Would playing 1 more game make him less likley to be a bust?

I mean seriously. which stance are you taking here? are you Vinny's father or something?

So because I do not have the same opinion as you, then you want to make really dumb insults?

My position is easy. One game would not matter a bit in the grand scheme of things. The young guys were not ready to play so they didnt play.

the idiot cost us more games and did so while being 42 years old and foolish-looking

So you would like him better if he was good looking?

we knew what the idiot brought to the table. fast forward to now, and who the hell knows what's gonna happen if Bledsoe goes down

So what you are saying is that 1 game experience would have been enough time to fully evaluate one of the young QBs? I mean otherwise if Bledsoe goes down its the same damn thing. Are you saying that you would have based how one of the QBs was going to turnout based on that one game, and then cut him or promoted him on the basis of that one game experience?

 

[Bob Sacamano]

What insight do you gain from one game? I mean Henson played 2 1/2 quarters and people think he is a bust. Would playing 1 more game make him less likley to be a bust?



So because I do not have the same opinion as you, then you want to make really dumb insults?

My position is easy. One game would not matter a bit in the grand scheme of things. The young guys were not ready to play so they didnt play.


So you would like him better if he was good looking?




So what you are saying is that 1 game experience would have been enough time to fully evaluate one of the young QBs? I mean otherwise if Bledsoe goes down its the same damn thing. Are you saying that you would have based how one of the QBs was going to turnout based on that one game, and then cut him or promoted him on the basis of that one game experience?

dude, the guy thinks TO could coexist peacefully after not being able to do it anywhere

 

[BigDFan5]

dude, the guy thinks TO could coexist peacefully after not being able to do it anywhere

thats ok I am having fun

 

[SupermanXx]

ok, tell me, what do you think Henson or ROmo would have shown you in that 1 game?

but here's what I think, probably what Parcells already knew about them...

they aren't ready! shoot, Henson showed us that in ONE...HALF, of football, you think he was going to miraculously get ready 5 games later?

lol.. I know what you're saying. It's not as if I was expecting Henson or Romo to come out of the gates looking all-world and MVP bound

but at the same time.. think of it as sex.

Vinny was a dirty, filthy, loose, horrificly STD'd hooker who had been around the block multiple times in his 42 year old span and not many people wanted to hit that anymore

Romo/Henson however were virgins... and every guy wanted to hit that and see what they were all about.

lol. i'm kidding. no idea what i just said

 

[ddh33]

Just for the record, I am not one of those guys saying, "Sign him at all costs!"

I do think that you owe it to yourself to talk to one of the most talented players in the league. You don't have to sign him.

 

[SupermanXx]

****** guys it's as if you're picking a stance and are too prideful to back away

TELL ME what sort of good it did us as of NOW to play Idiotverde during blowouts while paying the young Romo and Henson millions collectively. What do we know about them now? nothing. what do we know about Hairyballsverde? who cares, he's 43 and out of the league