jr40usa;2271537 said:Look for the Packers to be very physical with our WRs. This should open the chance for big plays.
jr40usa;2271537 said:Look for the Packers to be very physical with our WRs. This should open the chance for big plays.
jr40usa;2271537 said:Look for the Packers to be very physical with our WRs. This should open the chance for big plays.
masomenos85;2271677 said:Crayton will again be a non factor.
stasheroo;2271564 said:Look for the Cowboys to put Owens in motion (again!). This should open the chance for big plays (again!).
Bob Sacamano;2271686 said:didn't he have 2 TDs last time we played GB?
jr40usa;2271537 said:Look for the Packers to be very physical with our WRs. This should open the chance for big plays.
masomenos85;2271703 said:He did. I meant for another week in a row he'd be a non factor.
Nexx;2271839 said:but according to most Zoners, after the Cleveland game, he became our legit #2.
masomenos85;2271703 said:He did. I meant for another week in a row he'd be a non factor.
Bob Sacamano;2271865 said:ah
I think they should move both him and TO into the slot like the last time we faced the fearsome press of the Packer CBs
Vintage;2271867 said:Austin and Witten split out wide; Owens and Crayton in the slot? Actually, we could reverse Crayton and Witten...
Either way, Garrett will get Owens in favorable matchups like last time.