Parcells is 41-44 without Belicheck

[Bob Sacamano]

Parcells is similar to Larry Brown they are willing to take on woeful franchises in desperate need of direction and turn them around. Id rather have guys like that than front runners who only take over loaded teams to boost their winning percentages / egos.

*COUGH* Phil Jackson *COUGH*

 

[Kittymama]

One of the Spurts on PTI

Bill Parcells is 41-44 without Bill Belicheck - making him mortal?

Bill couldnt do it with Bledsoe back then with Pats.
Can he do it NOW in Dallas?

And that my fellow Cowboys fans is why we have faith and watch.

Oh fercryinoutloud--is THAT nonsense starting up again?!?!

That stat is so stupid. For one thing, it factors in FOUR teams that he inherited which were total dogs. You want a better comparison--how did Belichick do in Cleveland, without a team that Parcells had already built for him?

Frankly, that nonsense is just as stupid as saying Belichick can't win without Weis/Crennel.
Or Holmgren couldn't do it without Reid/et al.
Or Gibbs couldn't do it without his group of assistants
Or Walsh couldn't do it without HIS groups of assistants
OR JIMMY JOHNSON COULDN'T DO IT WITHOUT HIS ASSISTANTS

You really want to claim that?

It's an idiotic argument.

 

[dal0789]

Tom Landry never made it to a Super Bowl without Dan Reeves. Tom Landry is clearly an overrated bum.

Tom Landry = 5 Super Bowls
Dan Reeves = 8 Super Bowls

Dan Reeves > Tom Landry

(Sounds stupid, don't it.)

Just be-quiet now

 

[dmq]

ummm, last I knew, defense isn't the problem.

 

[GTaylor]

Parcells is similar to Larry Brown they are willing to take on woeful franchises in desperate need of direction and turn them around. Id rather have guys like that than front runners who only take over loaded teams to boost their winning percentages / egos.

Problem with Larry Brown is that he seems to burn every bridge he crosses.

 

[Dave_in-NC]

Both comparisons are stupid. Only the stupid can't see it.

Bingo!