Parcells: "Bledsoe's job not up for grabs"...

[BigDFan5]

Bledsoe's job isn't up for grabs?

No, that's clear. I know that's what you guys wanted to know, you look like a bunch of Cocker Spaniels down there

Now can we end the "bench bledsoe" insanity please?

 

[Alexander]

Now can we end the "bench bledsoe" insanity please?

Are you trying to be unreasonable?

 

[DBoys]

Yep!

End Of Discussion Romosexuals

 

[fortdick]

Now can we end the "bench bledsoe" insanity please?

Not a chance. The Romosexuals hate everyone named Drew. The only QB for this team has to be an UDFA from a Div II school that has no experience. Why place your bets on a proven NFL QB with HoF potential? And of course, that other guy is no good because he played baseball.

We need a golfer behind center , , , NOW!

 

[BigDFan5]

Are you trying to be unreasonable?

It's obvious I am a hater. By hater I mean that I want the team to have the best chance to win, and that doesnt involve QBs with no experience leading the team as we strive for the playoffs. I guess that makes me a "hater" of losing.

 

[Doomsday101]

Now can we end the "bench bledsoe" insanity please?

Never thought otherwise. I did like what I saw from Romo and feel a little better about the prospect of him coming into a game should Bledsoe get injured.

 

[theogt]

I think there's been like 2 people that have actually called for Romo to start. Sounds like the anti-Romos are the ones overreacting.

 

[DBoys]

Never thought otherwise. I did like what I saw from Romo and feel a little better about the prospect of him coming into a game should Bledsoe get injured.

Yep me too

 

[BigDFan5]

Never thought otherwise. I did like what I saw from Romo and feel a little better about the prospect of him coming into a game should Bledsoe get injured.

Not you, but many did LOL


As for him coming into the game, I feel better now than i did a week ago. i still wanna see him do it again.

 

[BigDFan5]

I think there's been like 2 people that have actually called for Romo to start. Sounds like the anti-Romos are the ones overreacting.

So being Pro Bledsoe is anti romo? Is that correct?

Also did I say how many people were calling for romo to start or did I just say to end the insanity? and your 2 number is incorrect

 

[Doomsday101]

Not you, but many did LOL


As for him coming into the game, I feel better now than i did a week ago. i still wanna see him do it again.

Agreed, He needs to continue to show himself if he can then I will feel a bit more comfortable should Dallas have to go to him within the season

 

[BigDFan5]

Agreed, He needs to continue to show himself if he can then I will feel a bit more comfortable should Dallas have to go to him within the season

Agreed

 

[theogt]

So being Pro Bledsoe is anti romo? Is that correct?

Did I say that?

Also did I say how many people were calling for romo to start or did I just say to end the insanity?

I wasn't just replying to your post.

and your 2 number is incorrect

O RLY?

 

[AmishCowboy]

It's hard to believe that anyone really thought that Bledsoe's job was up for grab's. Although. I'm pleased

 

[KingTuna]

FINALLY!!

Now can we stop with these ridiculous "Start Romo" threads...

hummm...Probably not.....Even after it's been said from the "Tuna's" own mouth and Jerry's own mouth now that Bledsoe is the QB in 2006, I am sure someone out there still living in fantasy land will undoubtedly post another thread to start the back-up QB.

Perhaps this time the threads will speak of a "conspiracy theory" or maybe this is all smoke and mirrors to avoid a big QB blow-up in camp.

Or perhaps, JUST perhaps.........They are telling the truth.................

I know, HUGE concept for some.

 

[BigDFan5]

Did I say that?

Your exact quote "I think there's been like 2 people that have actually called for Romo to start. Sounds like the anti-Romos are the ones overreacting."

So who in this thread is Anti Romo and why was it directed to me. Who has said numerous times I dont care who it is as long as the Cowboys get a QB.

I wasn't just replying to your post.

With something that had no bearing on it?

O RLY?

 

[CanadianCowboysFan]

What is funnier than some thinking Romo could unseat Bledsoe is the fact those same posters actually think we have a better shot to win with Romo than Bledsoe.

 

[theogt]

What is funnier than some thinking Romo could unseat Bledsoe is the fact those same posters actually think we have a better shot to win with Romo than Bledsoe.

Well, it's not a stretch to think that we would have less sacks with Romo.

BigDFan, I can't say it any more clearly: I wasn't just replying to your post or this thread in particular. I may have hit "Quick Reply" on your post, but that has nothing to do with who I was replying to.

 

[CanadianCowboysFan]

Well, it's not a stretch to think that we would have less sacks with Romo.

Probably, but will we also have four last minute comebacks with Romo, probably not.

 

[theogt]

Probably, but will we also have four last minute comebacks with Romo, probably not.

Did we have any last minute comebacks last year? We had a good 2nd half in the San Fran game and an almost comeback in the Oakland game. Other than that I don't recall any comebacks. I do have a horrible memory though.