Pat Watkins, Alan Ball, Oglesby etc..

NoLuv4Jerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,698
Reaction score
4,911
I would love to see Pat Watkins show the potential many of us (including Darren Woodson) think he has. He has size, speed, range....I would love for him to go out their sunday and dominate in COVERAGE.

I would love for Alan Ball to get some run and show the confidence many claim he shows in practice. From what I have read he gives TO all he can handle in practice...and I would love to see if that is fake bravado because the lights are not on...or would he truly get up in Santana Moss and show the organization he has the "no fear" attitude to play CB in this league. Same thing for Oglesby.

I would love for some of these young OL to get a chance that the team can trust that one of them will be the eventual starter for the Dallas Cowboys.

I would love for Stanback to go out and be a dominating physical presence his size suggest he should be.

I would love for JuJo to take the bulk of the carries and just let it all hang out.

I would love for Bobby Carpenter to give Bradie JAmes the day off and show the organization that he has preparing for this day and is ready to go regardless of how dissappointed both he and the team are with his progress to date.

I would love for Anthony Spencer to give Greg Ellis the day off and wreak havoc on the Skins all day.

I would love for Tank and Jason Hatcher to dominate in the trenches.

What I am basically saying is that we have some real high hopes about a LOT of our backups...and some of them are 1st rounders and/or first day picks. I would love for all of them to show the organization and the fans that they are not just along for the ride and that they have been preparing all year in the event their number is called
 

theebs

Believe!!!!
Messages
27,462
Reaction score
9,207
watkins is not going to play sunday and oglesby is never active.

Actually I am not even sure why oglesby is on the roster, its sad he is on the roster and we cut moore.

It will be interesting to see if ball is active.
 

Bluefin

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,209
Reaction score
9,677
Ogelsby = JAG

He hasn't gotten on the field in front of Nathan Jones in the dime, he's got nothing to offer long term, IMO.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
theebs;1856711 said:
watkins is not going to play sunday and oglesby is never active.

Actually I am not even sure why oglesby is on the roster, its sad he is on the roster and we cut moore.

It will be interesting to see if ball is active.

Oglesby will play Sunday b/c Newman and possibly Henry will rest.

Oglesby is a good ST player and a decent option at 4th CB. He's on the roster b/c we've had so many DB injuries. Had Newman and Henry been healthy all year, he'd have been gone.
 

Woods

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,460
Reaction score
61
theebs;1856711 said:
watkins is not going to play sunday and oglesby is never active.

Actually I am not even sure why oglesby is on the roster, its sad he is on the roster and we cut moore.

It will be interesting to see if ball is active.

Oglesby is an enigma.

I started a thread on him some time ago, saying he's one of the players on the roster we hear nothing about.
 

theebs

Believe!!!!
Messages
27,462
Reaction score
9,207
abersonc;1856716 said:
Oglesby will play Sunday b/c Newman and possibly Henry will rest.

Oglesby is a good ST player and a decent option at 4th CB. He's on the roster b/c we've had so many DB injuries. Had Newman and Henry been healthy all year, he'd have been gone.


I can see newman being inactive, But I think henry will be active.

I just dont think oglesby will be active and I am not sure ball will be.
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
Watkins is hurt. Ogelsby is inactive for a reason. Ball is perhaps the only person you've mentioned for which this post makes sense...except for Brown...whom you failed to mention. ;)
 

NoLuv4Jerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,698
Reaction score
4,911
tomson75;1856727 said:
Watkins is hurt. Ogelsby is inactive for a reason. Ball is perhaps the only person you've mentioned for which this post makes sense...except for Brown...whom you failed to mention. ;)

so you are saying Ellis could not use a blow...are you saying Stanback should not rest...you saying Columbo who has been playing on bum wheel should not rest...you saying James could not use a blow....you saying Barber should carry his normal load...are you saying Ratliff will not rest that knee...I mean we have a ton of guys who could really benefit to have the amount of snaps we see them play increase...for evaluation purposes and to rest some of our starters...if these guys are who we think they are...then why not? The skins interior DL are late round picks and they are young guys...the Skins lbers are down to a rookie HB Blades and Randall Godfrey...they are playing with subs in the defensive backfield...they are playing with late round picks on the OL...why shouldn't we be able to match up our young guys with that?
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
theebs;1856719 said:
I can see newman being inactive, But I think henry will be active.

I just dont think oglesby will be active and I am not sure ball will be.

Ball was active this week, why wouldn't he be active again?
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,838
Reaction score
112,744
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Except for Watkins that sounds like a great game plan.

Please forward to Wade. :D
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
bbailey423;1856745 said:
so you are saying Ellis could not use a blow...are you saying Stanback should not rest...you saying Columbo who has been playing on bum wheel should not rest...you saying James could not use a blow....you saying Barber should carry his normal load...are you saying Ratliff will not rest that knee...I mean we have a ton of guys who could really benefit to have the amount of snaps we see them play increase...for evaluation purposes and to rest some of our starters...if these guys are who we think they are...then why not? The skins interior DL are late round picks and they are young guys...the Skins lbers are down to a rookie HB Blades and Randall Godfrey...they are playing with subs in the defensive backfield...they are playing with late round picks on the OL...why shouldn't we be able to match up our young guys with that?

I wasn't saying any of those things, and I don't think I suggested them either. I should have clarified my post by highlighting the part of yours that I read...which was the first two paragraphs. I was only addressing the suggestions you made for the secondary.

I would love to see some of our backups against the skins' first teamers...and I think many of them will hold their own, if not impress. I just don't think we should be digging up inactives and third stringers just for fun. I'd still like to see us win the game.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,680
Reaction score
12,392
theebs;1856719 said:
I just dont think oglesby will be active and I am not sure ball will be.

I take back my previous post -- better question: Why if Ball AND Oglesby were active last week would they NOT be active against the Skins?

The OL is the only place other than DBs that I see any guys missing time -- Adams will be inactive as will Gurode (but we knew that going in) - Davis and Columbo will play but only when Romo is in -- Free, McQ, and Berger will take the tackle and RG spots. I don't see Marten getting in the lineup at all, he'll likely be inactive.
 

theebs

Believe!!!!
Messages
27,462
Reaction score
9,207
abersonc;1856786 said:
I take back my previous post -- better question: Why if Ball AND Oglesby were active last week would they NOT be active against the Skins?

The OL is the only place other than DBs that I see any guys missing time -- Adams will be inactive as will Gurode (but we knew that going in) - Davis and Columbo will play but only when Romo is in -- Free, McQ, and Berger will take the tackle and RG spots. I don't see Marten getting in the lineup at all, he'll likely be inactive.

well I didnt realize they were both active sunday, I cant remember the last time oglesby was active other than that game.

Roy will take one of the spots I imagine. Not sure which. And we may have to have an extra wr this week, if glenn is active and can not count for much then someone like stanbach will have to be active.

Not sure why you think adams will be inactive. If romo is active, adams sure better be.

free is another player never active on gameday and if adams is active I cant imagin free is. Although I agree that Free should be active and flo and columbo should be watching the second half of this game.

I think it is going to be kind of hard to sit as many guys as we want, unless they just leave 5 or more starters inactive.
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,104
Reaction score
11,428
Oglesby was probably active because of Roy's suspension and the domino effect that caused on special teams, especially with Keith Davis.

But if Newman doesn't play, or doesn't play much, it will probably be the same this week.

I'd like to see some of the young guys get a few spot snaps, but I don't think all these wholesale changes are going to happen. When we talk about resting people Sunday, we're talking about being careful with the few injured and dinged up guys we have. It's not like the whole second and third teams will be playing out there on Sunday.
 

IndianaCowboyFan

The Bullet
Messages
852
Reaction score
0
Cowboyfan81;1857042 said:
Olgesby was active for the Pats game, and took a few snaps on D as well.

I just watched the replay of that game and heard his name a couple of times. I would also like to see some of the backups get significant playing time.
 

Bizwah

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,158
Reaction score
3,877
I've read that Ball has made strides in practice....but I haven't read that he's been giving TO all he could handle.

Where did you read that?
 

NoLuv4Jerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,698
Reaction score
4,911
Bizwah;1857184 said:
I've read that Ball has made strides in practice....but I haven't read that he's been giving TO all he could handle.

Where did you read that?
Mickey mentioned it in one of his columns
 
Top