Superstar LB? He never reached that level.
For me he flashed as a rookie before he got hurt but him coming back off a major injury and then not looking like he lost a step it was unfortunate he got hurt again but I saw enough but I can't disagree with those that don't think he's worked the label yet..
IMO, I don't know, I say he is he may not be consistent enough yet to be labeled a solidified superstar, in your opinion hes not, that's cool,
but it's all there, he was IT at Texas, he's still that here, he just needs to remain healthy, but this guy's every bit as good or better than Sean Lee... if you can see it, it's right in front of you.
I mean, you can see it it's right in front of you, it's not too soon to say it... I get it he needs a more time to be an established superstar but he already just from his skill set and what he's already showed on the field that he is that guy,
So some of us can call him that..
I mean here's the crazy thing some of you all label busts after their rookie season is bad, they don't show much etc, or two years in you say they're a bust, well he's been here long enough and done enough for me to say he is that guy if he remains healthy.... I just want to make sure I get the Restrictions on these words because if we can use negative words for people too early We could use the positive words too early as well...

