Relayer
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,141
- Reaction score
- 1,773
Nah, some are talking like they want to see him gone yesterday.Asking for competition is not “ disdain “ you’re too emotional . Tap the brakes .
Nah, some are talking like they want to see him gone yesterday.Asking for competition is not “ disdain “ you’re too emotional . Tap the brakes .
Some of us aren't surprised and complain anyway.And when you go a number of years with the same players holding down starting jobs people , fans shouldn’t be surprised or complain when non playoff success is the result .

Oh I'm sure you know how that works.Yeah with the success the offense had makes you wonder how people think we did it lol.
But before the injury it was clear that he had lost it.If I remember correctly, Brady got his chance because of a nasty injury that Bledsoe suffered. Not by competition.
And that’s because of all the incredibly stupid posts people make.It’s sometimes hard to figure out who’s serious or ridiculous or sarcastic at times. Hahaha.
How many fumbles were turnovers? Dropped picks don't count. I don't think fumbles that don't result in turnovers are any different.4 drops the whole year? That’s nothing. 3 fumbles? Not good but probably overblown.
All the carries, both in college and the pros, and his running style caught up fast. As well as him playing injured. Too bad. Some people talk like he always sucked. He was on a HoF trajectory, until he wasn't.Body broke down way too fast, on some Zeke sh**
It's crazy comparing anyone to Brady.We don’t have anyone at QB at Brady’s level, or Quincy’s for that matter. Did you really want 140 yards per game Rush starting? Or do you prefer Milton?
I’ll have to check but I remember him having a higher YPC his first couple seasons. And he’d run people over or just over them. Lol. If I’m correct, he may have slowed down because of injuries. We have for at least one more season so maybe he can bounce back.To be honest after watching Ferguson since his rookie year I don’t think he’s a downfield threat . 3rd and 8 he may get you 9 may or it could be 7 . The radius is around 10 yards . I think it’s more the player then the play caller .
Yes I think you’re right.But before the injury it was clear that he had lost it.
But BB was unwilling to yank BledsoeYes I think you’re right.
I'm OK disagreeing over that, because I certainly understand seeing that way. I try to consider the value of what the player provides vs. the downside. Ferguson was a Pro Bowler last year because he provided an outlet option for one of the top offenses in the league. Yes, his drops and fumbles hurt, but his catches helped the offense keep moving and score more points than most of the offenses in the league.I guess I just fundamentally disagree with the idea that he's not a liability. 4 drops and 3 fumbles is a liability, especially the fumbles, and it's been two years in a row.
I like Ferg, but he just does not give you enough juice to justify putting the ball on the ground. A running back who fumbles 4 times a year would be a liability.
And you’re right as well. So it’s not just the Cowboys. LolBut BB was unwilling to yank Bledsoe
7 fumbles in two years is basically as bad as it gets.4 drops the whole year? That’s nothing. 3 fumbles? Not good but probably overblown.
how many fumbles and how many lost?7 fumbles in two years is basically as bad as it gets.
***? No, I’m advocating for KEEPING Dak, not moving on from him like others want. My entire point was the patriots started Brady because they thought he was going to be BETTER, they didn’t give Bledsoe his job back just because he had a new big contract. We should be starting the best players, not starting players based on where they were drafted or if they have the bigger contract.We don’t have anyone at QB at Brady’s level, or Quincy’s for that matter. Did you really want 140 yards per game Rush starting? Or do you prefer Milton?
I agree with your point. Just pointing out that we don’t have that player to compete nor have we had that during Dak’s tenure.***? No, I’m advocating for KEEPING Dak, not moving on from him like others want. My entire point was the patriots started Brady because they thought he was going to be BETTER, they didn’t give Bledsoe his job back just because he had a new big contract. We should be starting the best players, not starting players based on where they were drafted or if they have the bigger contract.
Yes. My initial comment was responding to someone who said every position should be up to competition….totally agree. Of course realistically there isn’t a real competition at QB….but at LT, at TE, where we have high draft picks and contract players….i wouldn’t be mad if If backups took those spots by showing out (our TE depth is intriguing to me, even though I like Ferg).I agree with your point. Just pointing out that we don’t have that player to compete nor have we had that during Dak’s tenure.
What are you talking about?how many fumbles and how many lost?
like you did not bother to look at drop rate either.
You clearly do not bother to check much, do you?
I guess I just don't see an "outlet" option as being particularly valuable.I'm OK disagreeing over that, because I certainly understand seeing that way. I try to consider the value of what the player provides vs. the downside. Ferguson was a Pro Bowler last year because he provided an outlet option for one of the top offenses in the league. Yes, his drops and fumbles hurt, but his catches helped the offense keep moving and score more points than most of the offenses in the league.
This seems like a good article on the good and bad of Jake Ferguson last year, even though it may be optimistic about what to expect of him this year: https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/fo...r-and-it-could-all-change-in-2026/ar-AA24rd7Q
