Fredd
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,995
- Reaction score
- 2,238
I grew up in a different era, when I was starting to drive drunk driving and DUI's were really just starting to become a big deal. I drove while drunk several times. I rode with others who were drinking. I drink rarely now and never drive within hours of drinking. When you get a family perspective changes.
If I get in a car with my best friend and he's drunk and he crashes I do not want his life ended by rotting in a cell for 20 years or a decision we both made. I want him to have the chance to better himself and atone for both our mistakes,
When a man does something intentional I'm all for throwing the book at him, when a man makes a stupid mistake and the victims family supports that man, then I see no issue with this sentence. If and it's a huge if he can keep his nose clean for 10 years. Then we've done more for Jerry Brown than trying to apply our justice for his death.
I would feel the same way if he was not a football player.
This is much like I think. since he is a "friend" in this scenario (a friend to the Cowboys), then he gets a chance to redeem himself, especially since the victim's mother supports him getting a second chance...but, what if he were someone that you didn't know (from another team in this analogy)...do you think that he should get that chance or if you walked by him on the street, would you want to kick him?
I can really see both sides of this