PFF Performances of Note for Cowboys players in Cowboys - Packers game

perrykemp

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,503
Reaction score
9,274
PFF performance of note for Cowboys players: https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2015/01/12/refo-cowboys-packers-divisional-round/

Found it interesting how much better the Cowboys ran to the right than the left - "Murray picked up 26 yards on 11 carries (2.4 yards per carry) to the left of center and 97 yards on 14 carries to the right of center (6.9 yards per carry)."


Dallas Cowboys – Performances of Note

Struggles in the Secondary, -5.5 for the starting five

Breakdown: Going up against the Packers’ receiving corps is no easy task and the Cowboys were done in by a few big plays given up on the back end. Perhaps the ugliest was the 46-yard touchdown by Adams that saw him lose CB Sterling Moore on the in-route, and then free safety JJ Wilcox took a terrible angle to allow Adams to get to the outside for the touchdown. Other key missed tackles in the second half include:

  • Q3 3:21: Moore unable to tackle Adams on 3rd-and-3, resulting in a 16-yard gain.
  • Q4 13.29: Orlando Scandrick fails to take down TE Andrew Quarless turning a short gain into a 13-yard first down.
  • Q4 2.36: Moore against Adams once again, this time Moore goes for the strip and loses Adams for the 26-yard gain on 3rd-and-3.
The secondary had to deal with some outstanding throws from Aaron Rodgers throughout the game, but missed tackles and bad angles really came back to hurt in key situations.

Signature Stat: Cornerbacks, Moore, Scandrick, and Brandon Carr were targeted a combined 22 times, allowing 15 receptions for 210 yards and a touchdown.

DeMarco Murray, RB, +0.2

Breakdown: The Dallas offensive line struggled to create room for Murray for much of the game, though he did a nice job of making the most of what he had. His two biggest runs came on a pair of well-blocked, poorly defended plays. Green Bay allowed him to get to the edge at Q3 4:51 and Murray burst up the sideline for a 26-yard gain. His 30-yard run was perfectly blocked and a nice cut by Murray combined with a poor angle by free safety Ha Ha Clinton-Dix turned it into a big gain. Beyond the two big plays, Murray gained 69 yards on 23 carries, which doesn’t look great, but he actually did a fine job even getting to that mark as he constantly turned one or two yard gains into four or five yards.

Of course the big play for Murray was his fumble at the 11:11 mark of the third quarter, as it was the one other play that was perfectly blocked, and Murray lost the ball on a Julius Pepper forced fumble. It was an up and down day for Murray who often made the most of what he had, but in the end, his one mishap proved costly.

Signature Stat: Murray picked up 26 yards on 11 carries (2.4 yards per carry) to the left of center and 97 yards on 14 carries to the right of center (6.9 yards per carry).

Ronald Leary, LG, -3.5

Breakdown: It was a rough start for Leary who was being easily handled by Packers defensive end Mike Daniels early and often. While he recovered to make a few key blocks, including a nice kick-out block on Murray’s 30-yard run and an outstanding block on 3rd-and-1 late in the first, it was a tough day overall that saw Leary finish at -1.4 as a pass blocker and -2.2 in the running game. He allowed two sacks and a hurry on the day, including a strip sack by Peppers on the first drive of the game. The aforementioned run blocks were the highlights of his day, but for the most part, he was moved about by the Packers’ defensive front.

Signature Plays: Leary allowed Peppers outside of him for the strip sack at the 13:38 mark of the first quarter. The second sack came on the first play of the fourth quarter and while the fact that the play resulted in a sack is partially on Tony Romo, Leary was pretty easily handled by Daniels on the bull rush.
 

Staubacher

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,316
Reaction score
23,743
Poor tackling and poor rush did us in. That's why I find it unfair all the post game criticisms are about people on the offense.

Wilcox cannot be our starting safety next season.
 

Crown Royal

Insulin Beware
Messages
14,229
Reaction score
6,383
Poor tackling and poor rush did us in. That's why I find it unfair all the post game criticisms are about people on the offense.

Wilcox cannot be our starting safety next season.

This. I think from a coverage perspective, the secondary actually did reasonably well. But when they gave up completions, just too much YAC allowed. Make your tackles and we looked TONs better.
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,489
Reaction score
44,544
This. I think from a coverage perspective, the secondary actually did reasonably well. But when they gave up completions, just too much YAC allowed. Make your tackles and we looked TONs better.

Well, I do trust Marinelli in his personnel decisions on defense. I have no doubt that if he thinks Wilcox is a problem he will tell Garrett and they'll try to do something about him. Both Garrett and Marinelli aren't afraid to cut their losses if they think he isn't a good player.

I could see them having to address other problems first though and having to stick with Wilcox another year. Of course all of this is assuming that Marinelli doesn't like Wilcox.
 

mahoneybill

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,912
Reaction score
4,528
This. I think from a coverage perspective, the secondary actually did reasonably well. But when they gave up completions, just too much YAC allowed. Make your tackles and we looked TONs better.

Agree. Thats the real key of Seattle defense. You may complete the pass but the YAC will be minimal..
 

mahoneybill

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,912
Reaction score
4,528
Well, I do trust Marinelli in his personnel decisions on defense. I have no doubt that if he thinks Wilcox is a problem he will tell Garrett and they'll try to do something about him. Both Garrett and Marinelli aren't afraid to cut their losses if they think he isn't a good player.

I could see them having to address other problems first though and having to stick with Wilcox another year. Of course all of this is assuming that Marinelli doesn't like Wilcox.

Will also be interesting to see if Marinelli feels that Wilcox can learn from and adjust. Charlie Waters comes to mind ( not saying Wilcox is or will be Waters) but he was routinely toasted as a CB , then became a very reliable safety.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,709
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Well, I do trust Marinelli in his personnel decisions on defense. I have no doubt that if he thinks Wilcox is a problem he will tell Garrett and they'll try to do something about him. Both Garrett and Marinelli aren't afraid to cut their losses if they think he isn't a good player.

I could see them having to address other problems first though and having to stick with Wilcox another year. Of course all of this is assuming that Marinelli doesn't like Wilcox.
Many of the plays that fans blamed on Wilcox this season were actually not his fault. Most people don't understand Safety play. When a deep safety is coming forward towards a player coming at him, the Safety has very limited options if you just consider the physics of the situation. Generally the safety has to direct the ball carrier in one direction with the expectation that he will get help if he directs him in the correct direction.
 

Shotgun Dave

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,974
Reaction score
561
Synergy = replacing Leary. It's too easy now to see the difference running right instead of left (either in tendencies or level of success). I'd spend a 3rd or 4th on guard if there was value to be had (once I drafted defense in 1 and 2).
 

dfense

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,109
Reaction score
6,542
Poor tackling and poor rush did us in. That's why I find it unfair all the post game criticisms are about people on the offense.

Wilcox cannot be our starting safety next season.

Wilcox does take bad angles and misses a lot of tackles. Need an upgrade there.
 

Staubacher

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,316
Reaction score
23,743
Wilcox does take bad angles and misses a lot of tackles. Need an upgrade there.

I mean the word "safety" implies, in part, a last line of defense. When your last line of defense takes bad angles and is hit or miss tackling that isn't very safe lol
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
Wilcox cannot be our starting safety next season.

He can if he keeps improving. Remember, he had never played safety in his life until 2012.

We should add competition at safety to improve the position overall, but that doesn't mean Wilcox can't win a starting job.
 

dragon_mikal

Fire Garrett
Messages
10,453
Reaction score
7,136
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
When they let the Packers score a TD on 3rd and 15 they got an epic fail from me.

I still get pissed thinking about it.
 
Top