PFT: Izzo Coverage Demonstrates Steroids Double Standard

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Posted by Mike Florio on February 17, 2009, 7:43 a.m.

We’re not quite sure how it started or why it continues. And, as folks who love football and loathe baseball, we’re not all that upset about it.

But the reality has been, is, and will continue to be that, while steroids use is a scarlet letter for guys who swing a stick, no such stigma applies to guys who put on pads.

The latest example? Pats linebacker Larry Izzo is expected to testify in the Barry Bonds perjury trial that Izzo received banned substances from Bonds’ trainer, Greg Anderson.

The news has been out there for a couple of days. But with the sports media transfixed by pro basketball’s meaningless two-day dog and pony show (apparently, Kobe has acquired a taste for Shaq’s ***), the news barely has generated a ripple.

We still don’t understand how this has happened. Maybe it’s because of the geekish obsession that so-called baseball purists have with the record book and the men who played in an era when the only available performance enhancer was a bottle of Scotch — as if Babe Ruth and Mickey Mantle wouldn’t have loaded up their rear ends with anything/everything that could have helped them hit the ball even farther. Or maybe it’s because we all realize at a visceral level that human males don’t sprout cartoonish physiques without pharmaceutical assistance.

Regardless, as a people we’re far past the point of caring about banned substances in football.

We’re not saying it’s right. We’re just acknowledge the truth.
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
A) People are sacred to go there in football, because it is probably everywhere
B) Football is much more of a team game than baseball, on the majority of plays, one guy doesn't stand out so there isn't that concern that one guy is carrying an entire team for the most part.
 

Kangaroo

Active Member
Messages
9,893
Reaction score
1
It is not good the NFL has always tested for steroids so they have always been looked as trying the problem with the NFL it is not a random test it is a dummy test unless you get put on the NFL abuse policy
 

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
21,218
Reaction score
24,066
The use of sports enhancing drugs is wide spread throughout the league, and anyone that is blind to that fact is , well, just blind.

There are several ways to beat the UA's , there are even products sold on the internet that enable you to beat a random, unanounced UA.

So basically in a nuttshell, its the morons that get busted.

Those that havent purchased the insurance policy so to speak, and prefer to gamble with the consequences of a positive UA, are the ones making the headlines for failing the tests.
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,655
Reaction score
43,001
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Hmmm...

Izzo...Bonds...Izzo...Bonds

Izzo...A-Rod...Izzo...A-rod

I imagine many people who are not football nuts don't have a clue who
Larry Izzo is but even if you don't like or follow baseball you know who A-Rod
and Barry Bonds are.

Some might read the name Izzo and think it is some character on the Old Grease Movie (yes I know it is rizzo):laugh1:
 

theebs

Believe!!!!
Messages
27,462
Reaction score
9,207
Yes because mickey mantle needed help playing baseball right.

Poor example there.

I love how dumb people just make dumb corelations and just say whatever.
 

TheCount

Pixel Pusher
Messages
25,523
Reaction score
8,849
Well let's see. A-Rod's contract is worth a GURANTEED 240 million dollars. Ben Roethlisberger is the highest paid player now I believe, his contract is worth MAYBE 100 million, and chances are he won't see all of it. We can start there with why steroids might be a bigger deal in baseball.
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
Mickey Mantle and Babe Ruth were playing with performance de-hancing drugs. those guys were drunk half the time.
 
Top