PFT: Murray deal has base value of $40 million, with $18 million fully guaranteed at signing

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,005
Reaction score
22,604
Murray deal has base value of $40 million, with $18 million fully guaranteed at signing
Posted by Mike Florio on March 13, 2015, 8:03 PM EDT

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...-with-18-million-fully-guaranteed-at-signing/


murray3.jpg
AP
The details of the DeMarco Murray contract have made their way to PFT headquarters. And now they’ll be making their way to your desktop, laptop, tablet, and/or cell phone device.

Per a source with knowledge of the deal, here are the elements of the deal.

1. Contrary to widespread reports, the contract has a base value of $40 million over five years. That’s the same base value as the deal signed by Bills running back LeSean McCoy.

2. Another $2 million is available based on escalators for 2016 through 2019. For each year from 2015 through 2018 in which Murray rushes for 1,250 or more yards, $250,000 is added to the following year’s salary. At 1,450, the number increases to $500,000. To get the full $2 million, Murray must rush for 1,450 or more yards in each of the next four seasons.

3. In 2015, Murray has a $5 million signing bonus, a $3 million fully guaranteed 2015 roster bonus, and a $1 million fully guaranteed base salary. That’s $9 million in total compensation for 2015, all fully guaranteed.

4. In 2016, Murray has a $7 million base salary, fully guaranteed at signing.

5. In 2017, Murray has a $500,000 roster bonus due on the third day of the league year, along with a $7.5 million base salary. $2 million is fully guaranteed at signing. Another $3 million is guaranteed for injury only at signing; it becomes fully guaranteed on the third day of the 2017 league year.

6. In 2018, Murray has a $500,000 roster bonus due on the third day of the league year, plus a non-guaranteed base salary of $7.5 million.

7. In 2019, Murray has a $500,000 roster bonus due on the third day of the league year, plus a non-guaranteed base salary of $7.5 million.

Those details equate to $18 million fully guaranteed at signing. Another $3 million is guaranteed for injury only until March 2017.

As a practical matter, it’s at least a two-year, $18 million deal, and possibly (probably) a three-year, $24 million deal with a team-held option for 2018 and 2019.

The cap numbers are $5 million in 2015, $8 million in 2016, $9 million in 2017, $9 million in 2018, and $9 million in 2019. In contrast, LeSean McCoy would have had a cap number in Philly of more than $11 million for 2015.

Coupled with the fact that McCoy has 656 more career touches than Murray, coach Chip Kelly found a cheaper option with more tread on the tires. Ultimately, the question is whether Murray can move the chains the way McCoy did.

If Murray can, that $24 million over three years becomes a definite — and $40 million over five becomes probable, along with some or all of the escalators available under the deal.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,005
Reaction score
22,604
The Eagles pay Murray what they wouldn't for McCoy...and with mal intent towards the Cowboys.
 

JoeyBoy718

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,715
Reaction score
12,709
The Eagles pay Murray what they wouldn't for McCoy...and with mal intent towards the Cowboys.

They pay Murray what they would have for McCoy and flip McCoy for a very talented LB. If they were gonna pay their RB anyway, it's a good deal to get a RB of equal talent for equal money and get an extra solid young LB.
 

Brooksey

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,154
Reaction score
7,664
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Eagles are paying top 5 RB money here over the next 2-3 years. Some people don't mind paying for quality. Demarco offered more quality to Philadelphia than McCoy because North/South guy and he's a locker room guy, a leader. When you have a runner like Murray in a short Romo window (3 years) You re-sign him for three years. I don't care one bit if there's another guy that may do it cheaper, it's high risk dealing with the unknown. I'm not willing to risk messing with success inside a tight window, but that's just me. This is a reasonable contract for the NFL's leading rusher, they can be out it in two-three years.

Jerry and Stephen playing Money-Ball (like all the CZ GM's) . I'm assuming you are all happy now and will talk most highly of your team/organization. (Yeah right).

I'm all for bargains (mostly my wife is) but good things are seldom cheap and cheap things are seldom good. They (Jones) know this but they are tired of being burned. This will be the new way until the Cap if fully cleaned up (next year), then maybe they will make one big FA signing each year like the Pats on one or two year deals.

With that i'm as hopeful as the next guy that we replace his production through the draft with McFadden, Williams, etc. but talk about RISKY. I think the McFadden signing signals that we will not look at RB in the early rounds 1-2 , but will lean toward a committee of McFadden, Williams, 3-5 rd pick.
 

NoLuv4Jerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,698
Reaction score
4,911
Eagles are paying top 5 RB money here over the next 2-3 years. Some people don't mind paying for quality. Demarco offered more quality to Philadelphia than McCoy because North/South guy and he's a locker room guy, a leader. When you have a runner like Murray in a short Romo window (3 years) You re-sign him for three years. I don't care one bit if there's another guy that may do it cheaper, it's high risk dealing with the unknown. I'm not willing to risk messing with success inside a tight window, but that's just me. This is a reasonable contract for the NFL's leading rusher, they can be out it in two-three years.

Jerry and Stephen playing Money-Ball (like all the CZ GM's) . I'm assuming you are all happy now and will talk most highly of your team/organization. (Yeah right).

I'm all for bargains (mostly my wife is) but good things are seldom cheap and cheap things are seldom good. They (Jones) know this but they are tired of being burned. This will be the new way until the Cap if fully cleaned up (next year), then maybe they will make one big FA signing each year like the Pats on one or two year deals.

With that i'm as hopeful as the next guy that we replace his production through the draft with McFadden, Williams, etc. but talk about RISKY. I think the McFadden signing signals that we will not look at RB in the early rounds 1-2 , but will lean toward a committee of McFadden, Williams, 3-5 rd pick.

Direct. Concise. To the point. Most importantly, the truth.
 

jblaze2004

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,170
Reaction score
11,399
i wish we knew how to trade talent before it is too late. I am glad we finally stop over paying for players. Just got to get better in the trade department.
 

mahoneybill

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,912
Reaction score
4,528
i wish we knew how to trade talent before it is too late. I am glad we finally stop over paying for players. Just got to get better in the trade department.

Agree. Hopefully with teams wanting our Free Agents a next step can be trading players out before they leave via FA.
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
i wish we knew how to trade talent before it is too late. I am glad we finally stop over paying for players. Just got to get better in the trade department.

It would have been better to trade Murray before last year?
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
Eagles are paying top 5 RB money here over the next 2-3 years. Some people don't mind paying for quality. Demarco offered more quality to Philadelphia than McCoy because North/South guy and he's a locker room guy, a leader. When you have a runner like Murray in a short Romo window (3 years) You re-sign him for three years. I don't care one bit if there's another guy that may do it cheaper, it's high risk dealing with the unknown. I'm not willing to risk messing with success inside a tight window, but that's just me. This is a reasonable contract for the NFL's leading rusher, they can be out it in two-three years.

Would Murray sign for only 3 years? I don't think so.
 

CF74

Vet Min Plus
Messages
26,167
Reaction score
14,623
Exactly what I wish we could have done, only guarantee 2-3 years max and part ways by the 4rth year. He's in his prime now and has exactly 2-3 good years of solid production barring some fluke injury that can happen to anybody at anytime.. Oh well I'm over it...:confused:
 

Avery

The Dog that Saved Charleston
Messages
19,465
Reaction score
20,518
Can't wait for the season to start so this will blow up in their face. I expect Demarco to have 800 yards this season due to holes not big enough to fit Wyoming as well as being banged up more in general.
 

DanTanna

Original Zone Member
Messages
4,025
Reaction score
3,298
Odds are in the next three years Murray is going to miss 10 games. We can't pay him for partial seasons, and that's what Murray does - play partial seasons.
 

BAZ

Drunken Mick
Messages
4,861
Reaction score
2,767
It's a five year contract but the last two years of this contract are not guaranteed.

Cap hit for letting him go is 2 in 2018 and 1 in 2019. If Murray can perform at the highest level then it may be a good deal, but if he even looses a step they may be in trouble. And the likelihood of that is very high.
 

btcutter

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,309
Reaction score
2,584
If Murray performs then $9 million hit in next two years is fine. But I can't live with $9 million cap hit in the following 3 yrs if he is cut or underperform. I think that's the major hangup in his negotiation with Dallas.
 
Top