PFW: Free-agent profile: Ravens ILB Bart Scott (UFA)

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,637
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
By Mike Wilkening
Feb. 16, 2009

This is the eighth in a series of scouting reports on high-profile free agents, in which we summarize each player's status, analyze his strengths and weaknesses, assess whether or not his team is likely to re-sign him, and determine the risk factor for the team that signs him. These scouting reports will be posted daily through Feb. 27, the start of the free-agent signing period.

News: No team has more coveted unrestricted free agents than the Ravens, who could have three-quarters of their vaunted LB corps — LILB Ray Lewis, ROLB Terrell Suggs and Scott, who starts inside with Lewis — hit the market. Can the Ravens retain all three linebackers? Scott's agent, Harold Lewis, believes that is unlikely — and that his client may have to sign elsewhere.

"All three of the free-agent linebackers would love to stay in Baltimore," Lewis told PFW in February. "They make a phenomenal 1-2-3 punch. But as far as that happening, the Ravens could be handcuffed, and it's very likely Bart will be the odd man out and looking for a new team."

Notes: The 6-2, 240-pound Scott played safety and linebacker at Southern Illinois, notching 352 tackles in three collegiate seasons. The Ravens signed him as an undrafted free agent in 2002, and he became an immediate special-teams contributor before working his way into the lineup on defense in '05. In four seasons as a defensive starter in Baltimore, Scott notched 370 tackles, 18 passes defensed and 16 sacks. His best season came in '06, when he made 103 tackles and registered 9½ sacks and two interceptions. Scott, who will turn 29 on Aug. 18, is entering his eighth NFL season.

Strengths: Scott has very good range for an inside linebacker and has been strong vs. the run and the pass in his time as a starter. He boasts sharp instincts and has benefited from starting four seasons in a defense known for its schematic flexibility and its ability to keep opposing offenses off balance. Scott spent the past seven seasons learning from Ray Lewis and would be a good mentor to a younger inside linebacker. He has not been much of a pass-rush threat the past two seasons, but he showed a real affinity for getting after the quarterback in '06 and also flashed the ability to even rush off the edge in certain packages. He was durable in his time as a starter on defense, playing every game from 2005-08.

Weaknesses: Scott has been more steady than spectacular in each of the past two seasons. What's more, his solo tackle numbers have dropped the past two seasons. His emotions can get the best of him: He was flagged for unsportsmanlike conduct after throwing an official's flag in a '07 loss to New England.

Risk factor: Moderate. A productive member of a sometimes-dominant Ravens defense, Scott could give the ILB corps of a 3-4 defense an immediate boost both as a player and a leader. The risk with Scott is that his production may be inflated from playing in such a strong defense for the last several seasons, but with more and more teams turning to the 3-4 front, he is likely to be paid handsomely in free agency.

http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/Features/Free+Agency/2009/scott021609.htm
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Romo2Roy4six;2641960 said:
yes to Scott:) ...IMO

No in my book. He is a pretty good player, but Suggs and Lewis prop him up. Coming from the Ravens, he is going to be expensive. Keeping Thomas would be cheaper and you keep a quality player. Bart Scott would be a downgrade from Thomas.

Next.
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
*shrugs* I wouldn't complain but honestly if we got anyone from the Ravens I'd want it to be Lewis.
 

BehindEnemyLinez

Optimist Prime
Messages
2,253
Reaction score
10
nyc;2641969 said:
No in my book. He is a pretty good player, but Suggs and Lewis prop him up. Coming from the Ravens, he is going to be expensive. Keeping Thomas would be cheaper and you keep a quality player. Bart Scott would be a downgrade from Thomas.

Next.
Thomas > Scott...maybe 2-3 seasons ago, but not now! Scott has been an every-down ILB and while I doubt he's as knowledgeable as Zach, physically, he's a much better player at this point of their careers. As long as he doesn't break the bank, I say put him next to Bradie and let them rock.
 

Chuck 54

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,503
Reaction score
12,523
No more older guys....Scott has quite a few seasons under his belt. We need to bring in a younger guy, not another Zach Thomas veteran.

This is a young man's game; I think we'll resign DWare and then focus on the draft or lesser FAs
 

SLATEmosphere

Benched
Messages
9,633
Reaction score
2
wayne motley;2642063 said:
No more older guys....Scott has quite a few seasons under his belt. We need to bring in a younger guy, not another Zach Thomas veteran.

This is a young man's game; I think we'll resign DWare and then focus on the draft or lesser FAs

Scott is 28 and will cost the same amount as Kevin Burnett..you'd be surprised.
 

Billy Bullocks

Active Member
Messages
4,098
Reaction score
22
Scott's a good LB IMO.

But I think that he, as has been pointed out, got propped up by the supporting cast.

Look at the 3 guys he's got in front of him, Ngata, Gregg, Price, etc. Those guys are huge, and they free up the LBs to make plays.

Suggs and Lewis draw a lot of attention too.

I think the Ravens would let Scott walk 1st, then Lewis, with Suggs being the most coveted.

Not to mention, SOMEONE will probably overspend on the guy if he hits the market. He'll be overpaid.
 
Top