Vintage;3094872 said:Shoulda picked up that 1st with the blockers he had out front.
very trueBiggems;3094884 said:forte was too impatient....he didnt allow his blockers to block, he ran past them and into the tackle. if he slows down just a bit and lets them block, it is a first down.
yimyammer;3094856 said:Does anyone else wish the current score wasn't posted in the thread title?
I watch the games on my DVR and i'm usually behind by 30 minutes to an hour, so if I decide to peruse the forum while I watch the game, the thread title spoils the game for me.
Is there any chance the current score can stop being posted in the title?
Not trying to start a war, just a friendly request.
There are quite a few people who aren't watching the game and are posting in other threads who simply want to know the score.yimyammer;3094856 said:Does anyone else wish the current score wasn't posted in the thread title?
I watch the games on my DVR and i'm usually behind by 30 minutes to an hour, so if I decide to peruse the forum while I watch the game, the thread title spoils the game for me.
Is there any chance the current score can stop being posted in the title?
Not trying to start a war, just a friendly request.
Biggems;3094887 said:hmmm so i am thinking whoever loses next week's game can pretty much kiss their postseason chances goodbye
CATCH17;3094890 said:Between?
Don Corleone;3094888 said:Sure, let us all bow down to the request of your highness.
Nevermind those poor peasants that are watching the game in real time. We must not post the score to please you.
After all, the rest of us are just mere pawns, means to an end.
:laugh2:
WoodysGirl;3094889 said:There are quite a few people who aren't watching the game and are posting in other threads who simply want to know the score.
This makes it simple for them.
If more people complain, then we'll consider an alternative.
viman96;3094913 said:LOL I request they leave the score in the thread title.