Play Henson/romo Please

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,893
Reaction score
27,488
jackrussell said:
The never ending need of fans needing to see with their own eyes what the coaches already know.
If they are that bad, then shame on Parcells for putting sorry QB's behind Bledsoe in a playoff fight.
 

Dave_in-NC

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,049
Reaction score
5,132
Cowboy_love_4ever said:
If they are that bad, then shame on Parcells for putting sorry QB's behind Bledsoe in a playoff fight.

Not many teams have great back ups at QB. You cant afford them. Back up QBs should be servicable, I would think that is what Parcells thinks of Romo. Does it matter if we see it?
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
jackrussell said:
The never ending need of fans needing to see with their own eyes what the coaches already know.
Scott Brunner over Phil Simms. Remember that?
 

zack

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,844
Reaction score
2,779
Cowboy_love_4ever said:
It's time to see what we have in these guys, and Bledsoe has nothing to gain. We know what he can do, and plus he's going to be the starter next year, so let's get them in Parcells.


Why? They belong in the NFL Europe. That is where they can start.
 

jackrussell

Last of the Duke Street Kings
Messages
4,165
Reaction score
1
Cowboy_love_4ever said:
If they are that bad, then shame on Parcells for putting sorry QB's behind Bledsoe in a playoff fight.

I agree.
 

Chuck 54

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,496
Reaction score
12,515
Let's see...we want Atlanta and Philly to play games that are meaningless to them like it's the SB and get pissed when their scrub QB is pulled for another scrubb QB, yet we think our meaningless game is an ideal time to play backups and evaluate them....that's somewhat ironic and hypocritical.

I say play to win...if we get up big or down big, play Romo. Of course, we're not the coaches...maybe they already know what they have without playing him in a game...of course, that would mean they know he stinks....I think if either of our youngsters were lighting it up in practice and showing exciting strides, the coaches would then be looking for opportunities to get a look see in a game.
 

CanadianCowboysFan

Lightning Rod
Messages
25,363
Reaction score
8,139
The games for Atlanta and Philadelphia were NOT meaningless, unlike our's which will have no effect on anything.
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
wayne_motley said:
Let's see...we want Atlanta and Philly to play games that are meaningless to them like it's the SB and get pissed when their scrub QB is pulled for another scrubb QB, yet we think our meaningless game is an ideal time to play backups and evaluate them....that's somewhat ironic and hypocritical.

I say play to win...if we get up big or down big, play Romo. Of course, we're not the coaches...maybe they already know what they have without playing him in a game...of course, that would mean they know he stinks....I think if either of our youngsters were lighting it up in practice and showing exciting strides, the coaches would then be looking for opportunities to get a look see in a game.
That might make sense but nobody else's playoff hopes are riding on this game tonight. Not quite the same thing.
 

jackrussell

Last of the Duke Street Kings
Messages
4,165
Reaction score
1
jimmy40 said:
Scott Brunner over Phil Simms. Remember that?

Hey, you NEED to see them, and I don't. If they play, fine, if they don't, big deal. A quarter or half against the Rams will provide us no more information than we already know, nada.
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,893
Reaction score
27,488
wayne_motley said:
Let's see...we want Atlanta and Philly to play games that are meaningless to them like it's the SB and get pissed when their scrub QB is pulled for another scrubb QB, yet we think our meaningless game is an ideal time to play backups and evaluate them....that's somewhat ironic and hypocritical.

I say play to win...if we get up big or down big, play Romo. Of course, we're not the coaches...maybe they already know what they have without playing him in a game...of course, that would mean they know he stinks....I think if either of our youngsters were lighting it up in practice and showing exciting strides, the coaches would then be looking for opportunities to get a look see in a game.
Be honest, if the game was Cowboys 80 Rams 3, Parcells would never bring those guys in.
 

Dave_in-NC

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,049
Reaction score
5,132
Cowboy_love_4ever said:
Be honest, if the game was Cowboys 80 Rams 3, Parcells would never bring those guys in.

He has no reason to, thats the point. He knows how they can play.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Cowboy_love_4ever said:
It's time to see what we have in these guys, and Bledsoe has nothing to gain. We know what he can do, and plus he's going to be the starter next year, so let's get them in Parcells.

it'll be a waste of time, all we'll see is a greenhorn QB, not ready to lead a franchise...one game means ****
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Da Hammer said:
I absolutely agree if the Cowboys play Henson or Romo at least i'll feel like this last week wasn't a waste but man with Parcells never. Which is a complete shame because Bledsoe doesn't even need this game and would be a complete waste of a game

how is a win, a "waste of a game"
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,893
Reaction score
27,488
summerisfunner said:
it'll be a waste of time, all we'll see is a greenhorn QB, not ready to lead a franchise...one game means ****
Outstanding, let's ditch these losers in the offseason and go after a QB in the first round. He can back up Bledsoe, and we can get some dumb smuck to play 3rd string and get on with it.

Bledsoe can play one more year and get lost, then we can play the new guy and our future starts then. But why waste time with these bums if they can't play.
 

jbsg02

Active Member
Messages
1,719
Reaction score
0
Romo won't start, but I think if Bledsoe is REALLY struggling then Romo MIGHT play.
 

Da Hammer

The Natural
Messages
10,604
Reaction score
1
summerisfunner said:
how is a win, a "waste of a game"
What do we gain if Bledsoe is in there and wins the game???? I'm not saying i don't want to win, i'm saying that it would be much more valuable to this team if one of our young QB's is in there gets good experience and maybe gets the win. We already know what Bledsoe's strengths and weaknesses are, so does every other team in the league. But we don't know what Romo's and Henson's are
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Da Hammer said:
What do we gain if Bledsoe is in there and wins the game???? I'm not saying i don't want to win, i'm saying that it would be much more valuable to this team if one of our young QB's is in there gets good experience and maybe gets the win. We already know what Bledsoe's strengths and weaknesses are, so does every other team in the league. But we don't know what Romo's and Henson's are

I don't know of any QB who gained much from playing a single game...and I don't know if any team knowing for sure what they got in a young QB, after a single game...

so pardon me if I don't buy into, "we need to see what we have in our young QB, in this 1 game"
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,893
Reaction score
27,488
I just want a reason to be happy, this is depressing.
 
Top