Play it smart and take an OL

[BlackJackMurphy]

If Sears is there at 22 we MUST take him - I say MUST because I keep reading that Jarrett is a massive reach and is predicted in the 30's -40's pick wise NOT 22. And I know this is who I hear we want. If we take a DB, he'll most likely be a ST player - IMO a guy like Sears can come in and push for a Job - somewhere.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

the only olinemen I'm considering in the 1st are Levi Brown and Joe Staley, Staley most likely being available at 22

 

[Cowboys&Caps]

You talk about Jarret at 22 as a reach


only to say we should take Sears at 22 and that is not a reach.........

can you hear yourself?

 

[Bob Sacamano]

You talk about Jarret at 22 as a reach


only to say we should take Sears at 22 and that is not a reach.........

can you hear yourself?

:laugh2:

 

[jobberone]

I agree. Why would you pass up Staley when some say he's as good as the first two and take Sears with your 22?

 

[big dog cowboy]

If Sears is there at 22 we MUST take him

Prepare for disappointment. That ain't gonna happen pardner. Way to early.

 

[jrumann59]

I do not see an all world OL in this draft like D'Brickashaw, and since OL is one of the hardest to guage talent wise wasting a 1st rounder on that position is stupid unless you have that "All World OL" but for ever D'Brickashaw there are numerous Gallerys

 

[ArmyCowboy]

I wouldn't mind Staley at #22 at all. He could push for the RT job immediately and be a strong candidate for LT next season ('08) if Flozell isn't resigned.

HOWEVER, Jerry has NEVER selected an OL in the first round, and with the signing of Leonard Davis, I highly doubt this is the year he breaks that trend.

 

[5mics]

If Sears is there at 22 we MUST take him - I say MUST because I keep reading that Jarrett is a massive reach and is predicted in the 30's -40's pick wise NOT 22. And I know this is who I hear we want. If we take a DB, he'll most likely be a ST player - IMO a guy like Sears can come in and push for a Job - somewhere.

Are you being serious or just trollin'?

 

[MichaelWinicki]

Are you being serious or just trollin'?

That is a good question.

 

[DLCassidy]

Scott Wright has us passing on Sears twice.:laugh1:

 

[Ratmatt]

If Sears is there at 22 we MUST take him - I say MUST because I keep reading that Jarrett is a massive reach and is predicted in the 30's -40's pick wise NOT 22. And I know this is who I hear we want. If we take a DB, he'll most likely be a ST player - IMO a guy like Sears can come in and push for a Job - somewhere.

I wouldn't take Sears at 22,but I would consider him,Blaylock,or Grubbs if they traded down to the end of the 1st round,or the early 2nd.

 

[Ratmatt]

the only olinemen I'm considering in the 1st are Levi Brown and Joe Staley, Staley most likely being available at 22

I totally agree with you.I wouldn't consider any of the guards at 22,and staley is the only tackle I think would be there at 22,and I would definately be interested in him.

 

[VACowboy]

Staley at #22 would be cool with me but I'd rather trade down to the end of the round and select Blalock, then snatch Barbre at #87 and Johnnie Lee Higgins with the extra 3rd we got in the trade.

 

[CrazyCowboy]

Guess we are trading up for a RB.........this is a non issue

 

[AbeBeta]

2nd round is the spot for an interior lineman

 

[Cowboys&Caps]

Guess we are trading up for a RB.........this is a non issue

??? what????

were taking Tony Hunt in the third round

 

[carphalen5150]

Staley at #22 would be cool with me but I'd rather trade down to the end of the round and select Blalock, then snatch Barbre at #87 and Johnnie Lee Higgins with the extra 3rd we got in the trade.

You have become a Higgins-pimp. For shame VA...for shame

 

[VACowboy]

You have become a Higgins-pimp. For shame VA...for shame

Yeh. Yeh. I know.