evarc;3230475 said:
Chocolate Lab;3230500 said:I really don't think they will, though. Even they have admitted they aren't a good blitzing team.
I think they'll just play that cover-2 and make Romo be patient.
evarc;3230475 said:
Beast_from_East;3230812 said:Good find, what I dont understand is if Romo is this good against the blitz, why is he the most blitzed QB in the NFL???
I read somewhere that Romo is blitzed on like 57% of his passes, which rates him #1 in the NFL as the most blitzed QB. I could understand if the blitz was effective, but he is just killing teams when they blitz and they keep doing it. I seriously dont get it.
Chocolate Lab;3230500 said:I really don't think they will, though. Even they have admitted they aren't a good blitzing team.
I think they'll just play that cover-2 and make Romo be patient.
http://sportsgurublog.yardbarker.co...st_the_blitz/1901100#comment_controls_1901100fan62;3230840 said:Yes,very good find. I have been searching for this data, but can't seem to find it.
Please post the source?
theogt;3231083 said:These numbers are wrong. According to STATS LLC, Romo has a 95.7 QB rating against the blitz.
Flacco has a 103.4 rating. Roethlisberger a 105.5. Peyton Manning a 118.5.
I'm not sure what is considered "official" but STATS LLC is the company that provides the stats listed on the websites of ESPN and just about every other major media.CowboyMcCoy;3231114 said:It looks like we have us a Mexican standoff. I'm not sure what to believe. Which source is considered official?
theogt;3231124 said:I'm not sure what is considered "official" but STATS LLC is the company that provides the stats listed on the websites of ESPN and just about every other major media.