Poison Pill wording in Contracts, What do you think....

abersonc;1424810 said:
The NFLPA wants an investigation -- They aren't claiming he was screwed -- they want to see if he was screwed.

I think as far as the NFLPA is concerned, poison pilll deals are fine as they create the potential for players to earn more $.
Semantics. They're claiming it's a possibility that he was screwed. What's the point of arguing with me over such a slight difference in wording?

And as we've already seen the NFLPA is very concerned when contracts go from $40 million to $20 million because of the poison pill.
 
theogt;1424923 said:
Semantics. They're claiming it's a possibility that he was screwed. What's the point of arguing with me over such a slight difference in wording?

As I read your post you were saying that the PA was saying he was screwed - that struck me as an anti-NFLPA statement where as I see it they are just investigating to make sure the folks they represent weren't screwed.

Take it however you want.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,267
Messages
13,862,448
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top