- Messages
- 78,705
- Reaction score
- 43,165
Danny White said:Good... for the most part, BNA is just way too predictable in his takes... we need some other libs to mix it up.
I like bens takes, may not agree with them...when he is being serious.
Danny White said:Good... for the most part, BNA is just way too predictable in his takes... we need some other libs to mix it up.
BrAinPaiNt said:We could also use some more in the middle.
I find myself playing devils advocate leaning towards the left side just to get some conversation stimulated.
Mike 1967 said:Depends on what you mean by middle.
If you mean straddling the fence....then most times you can have it.
For whatever reason, people today seem to view holding no position as a high virtue.
But if it is such a high virtue...then forums should be viewed as places of ill-repute. Because the very nature of forum is the discourse of viewpoints....and the very nature of viewpoints requires that you get off the fence.
BrAinPaiNt said:Here is the problem people have with those that are characterized as being on the fence.
If a person is of one party, then most times no matter what the party does they are OK....however if the other party does the same exact thing then that other party is BAD.
With being in the middle I can be objective enough to say...both are wrong.
Also...why not take your political discussions to where they belong...the political zone.
Sounds like your takes would be welcomed...instead of the idea of keeping pressing those ideas on this forum.
Mike 1967 said:As much as I like debating the value of Zimmer to the existing Defense.....you really don't want to get me started on morality, truth and Religion. Which is truly the core of any debate involving liberalism vs. conservatism.