What blows my mind is we have what , over20,000 members and only 311 have voted. Shoot we have over 8,000 visitors right now.As of 9:58 AM:
B and C still command nearly 70% of total votes combined, BUT only eight votes separate the two opinions. That's freaking tight. I would have never guessed it would be that close. It may come down to a wire finish tomorrow afternoon. In my best Mr. Spock impression, "Fascinating..."
Your observations are exactly what I try to convey in conversations from time to time. It may really seem that many members are talking about a given subject. AND that this side or that side represents all of CowboysZone. The fact is, practically all discussions, every day, are by participants representing a small fraction of total membership.
You mean the guy that was the QB for 3 consecutive 12-5 seasons? Strange.
Then what did he do in the playoffs on those seasons? Strange.
That's the thing, some people on here credit the supporting cast for the 12-5 and others credit the Quarterback. Then those guys whose mantra it is that it is the team and not the quarterback, suddenly go silent when someone credits the QB for the regular season record. Neutrality and levelheadedness they pride themselves on -- out the window.
It was a combination of factors . And which cost us in playoffs. It’s usually never just one thing.
Those losses weren’t all about our QB. The point I think KS was making is we aren’t a 12-5 team without him. Could he have done more in playoffs , probably but so could rest of team And sometimes like against SF not a good matchup or simply beat by better team. GB was a different story. Total clusterfruk and team loss. Awful!!
Its never all about 1 player
2-5
