Poor Choice

Spectre

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,748
Reaction score
522
What gives?
Why not get this kid involved more early in the game?
He's got a ton of experience from college so I am sure he can handle pass protection and assignments.
Just because Felix is shut down doesn't mean we HAVE to lean on Barber entirely and have no other playmaker in the backfield.
I think the kid is young and hungry and that'll translate to fast in a game if he gets enough work to do something.

I think Barber is great but his specialty is closing. I think it would only help him to incorporate Choice into a role similar to Julius in the past, letting them rotate drives with Barber getting the lion's share in the 4th Q.

JMO.
 
I don't even think I noticed that.
That's really fooslish.
 
Because he drops simple passes that lead to fumbles during key moments of the game...
 
el_chevo;2440065 said:
Because he drops simple passes that lead to fumbles during key moments of the game...
That was a poor decision by Romo.

You don't throw a pass to a guy 5 feet from you. He had no time to react.
 
el_chevo;2440065 said:
Because he drops simple passes that lead to fumbles during key moments of the game...

He was actually being blocked when that pass was thrown, so he was falling backwards when the pass got to him. I love Romo, but he should have never thrown that pass. The defense read that play all the way.
 
Choice was to blame for running the wrong direction on one rush play though. Live and learn.
 
Spectre;2439653 said:
What gives?
Why not get this kid involved more early in the game?
He's got a ton of experience from college so I am sure he can handle pass protection and assignments.
Just because Felix is shut down doesn't mean we HAVE to lean on Barber entirely and have no other playmaker in the backfield.
I think the kid is young and hungry and that'll translate to fast in a game if he gets enough work to do something.

I think Barber is great but his specialty is closing. I think it would only help him to incorporate Choice into a role similar to Julius in the past, letting them rotate drives with Barber getting the lion's share in the 4th Q.

JMO.

He played. Dallas is not going to give them equal time. Barber is the man and Choice will spell him at times
 
el_chevo;2440065 said:
Because he drops simple passes that lead to fumbles during key moments of the game...

While he should have concentrated harder on getting the ball in his hands, that play was a worse decision by Romo than it was a poor execution by Choice.
 
tomson75;2440100 said:
While he should have concentrated harder on getting the ball in his hands, that play was a worse decision by Romo than it was a poor execution by Choice.

Yes, Romo should have thrown the ball away. Even had Choice caught the pass, it would have been a big loss in yardage. Poor decision.

But Romo has poor decisions every game, usually mixed in with brilliant big plays. can live with a few snafus as long as the big plays keep coming.
 
el_chevo;2440065 said:
Because he drops simple passes that lead to fumbles during key moments of the game...

Interception. Tony, R should've let that one "sail" out of bounds........
 
Its a shorter list for what Garrett and Phillips does right with our weapons than what they do wrong or do not do at all.

Sad but true.
 
DaBoys4Life;2440177 said:
was a fumble......

Originally was ruled an INT, then changed to a fumble I think. it should have been an INT considering Choice never had clear control of the ball.
 
Smith22;2440180 said:
Originally was ruled an INT, then changed to a fumble I think. it should have been an INT considering Choice never had clear control of the ball.

It was ruled a fumble and credited to Romo per NFL.com. Correctly. It was changed from a INT because is wasn't a forward pass.
 
Smith22;2440180 said:
Originally was ruled an INT, then changed to a fumble I think. it should have been an INT considering Choice never had clear control of the ball.
it was ruled a fumble because it was a backwards pass. has nothing to do with whether choice had control of the ball or not
 
KLJ;2440195 said:
it was ruled a fumble because it was a backwards pass. has nothing to do with whether choice had control of the ball or not

You know, watching the play originally, I thought it was a backwards pass, but the replay made it look really close.
 
Smith22;2440198 said:
You know, watching the play originally, I thought it was a backwards pass, but the replay made it look really close.
i agree but i think it was ultimately changed from an int. to a fumble because it was determined to be backwards.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,961
Messages
13,907,038
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top