Possible trade partner...

[Bware_Dware]

Vikings own 2 1sts. They have a big need at MLB and so do the gmen who pick after us. If Ogletree falls to us I could see us trading back to 22...

Thoughts

 

[Vabeachboy]

I agree. We would not be moving so far back that we can still get who we want. And possibly get another 2nd-3rd out of the deal. Obviously a second and 22 is way too good to pass up. Even a early third would be great!

 

[Fredd]

Ogletree should be there, but i see them more going for Patterson or Austin if they are in that range

 

[TheSport78]

Only if "the big 5" OL are off the board.

 

[DFWJC]

Vikings own 2 1sts. They have a big need at MLB and so do the gmen who pick after us. If Ogletree falls to us I could see us trading back to 22...

Thoughts

This really depends on who is still on the board. The teams right behind us also want a lot of what we want--Oline and Dline.

I do agree that Minn would be a good trade down partner if what we wanted at 18 was gone.

 

[NorthwestDallas40]

Vikings own 2 1sts. They have a big need at MLB and so do the gmen who pick after us. If Ogletree falls to us I could see us trading back to 22...

Thoughts

There is no way they are giving us both of their first round picks to trade up that distance. So I'm not sure a trade with them is any more likely than with any other team.

 

[respectdatstar]

There is no way they are giving us both of their first round picks to trade up that distance. So I'm not sure a trade with them is any more likely than with any other team.

I think the idea was 18 for 22 and a 3rd. Not 18 for both 1sts. Also, I believe Minnesota has 23 and 25, not 22 and 25.

 

[Bware_Dware]

I think the idea was 18 for 22 and a 3rd. Not 18 for both 1sts. Also, I believe Minnesota has 23 and 25, not 22 and 25.

Correct and correct thanks

 

[Nightman]

I think the idea was 18 for 22 and a 3rd. Not 18 for both 1sts. Also, I believe Minnesota has 23 and 25, not 22 and 25.

18 for 25 and 83 works according to the chart