Post Combine Top 32

[realtick]

That's not true.

His agility numbers were off the charts for a guy that size. His broad jump was weak (probably a technique issue considering his vert) and his 40 time was very bleh. But the rest of his numbers were good and he looked great in drills.

I'd rate him about even with Robert Quinn of last year but Quinn had some character concerns and sat out a year of football which is why he hit double digits in the draft.

Kerrigan is an interesting comparison. He was faster in the 40 than Ingram. Slower in the 3 cone and short shuttle. He was better in the bench press by 3 reps and far better in the broad jump but slightly less in the vert. Kerrigan had a phenomenal college career but looked a bit stiff in the drills at the combine. Ingram looked great in the drills at the combine but played inside at DT and even at middle linebacker collegiately.

His 10-yard split which is an important measure for a pass rusher was average, if not below average compared to the rest of the iinemen who tested, a the majority of which were much bigger than he is.

His 20-yard shuttle is good, but it should be because he's one of the smaller players that tested as a lineman. Other linemen that were close to his size tested out with nearly the same times.

He does have good agility, but I don't think that was ever in question with him.

 

[Hoofbite]

I think J Jenkins goes in the top 20. Dallas could trade down 4-5 spots and still get an impact player, IMO. That would gain what, an extra 3rd?

And a headache.

That guy would get eaten alive by the media in Dallas.

 

[Hoofbite]

updated:
1.Andrew Luck-QB-Stanford
2.Robert Griffin-QB-Baylor
3.Dontari Poe-NT-Memphis
4.Melvin Ingram-OLB-South Carolina
5.Trent Richardson-RB- Alabama
6. Matt Kalil-OT-USC
7-Justin Blackmon-WR-Oklahoma State
8.Morris Claiborne-CB-LSU
9.Fletcher Cox-DT-Mississippi State
10.Quinton Coples-DE-North Carolina
11.David DeCastro-OG-Stanford
12.Dre’ Kirkpatrick-CB-Alabama
13.Michael Brockers-DT-LSU
14.Jonathan Martin-OT-Stanford
15.Michael Floyd-WR- Notre Dame
16.Cordy Glenn-OL-Georgia
17.Devon Still-DT- Penn State
18. Whitney Mercilus-DE- Illinois
19.Coby Fleener-TE- Stanford
20.Nick Perry-DE- USC
21.Luke Kuechly-LB- Boston College
22.Kevin Zeitler-OG- Wisconsin
23.Ryan Tannehill-QB- Texas A&M
24.Doug Martin-RB- Boise State
25.Jerel Worthy-DT- Michigan State
26.Bobby Wagner-LB- Utah State
27.Stephon Gilmore-CB- South Carolina
28.Kendall Wright-WR- Baylor
29.Dwayne Allen-TE- Clemson
30.Donta Hightower-LB- Alabama
31.Kendall Reyes-DT- UConn
32.Stephen Hill-WR- Georgia Tech
33.Riley Reiff-OG- Iowa

Holy ****!

At this pace he's going to surplant Luck after his Pro Day.

 

[Cowboys&LakersFan]

Lol so that website thinks we're taking a wideout with our pick?

 

[fanfromvirginia]

Lol so that website thinks we're taking a wideout with our pick?

It's not a mock draft. It's a player ranking. It is weird, though, to notice the big difference between where players get ranked and where teams take them. It shows both that teams talk a mean BPA game but rarely follow up and how differently individuals -- teams, experts and journalists alike -- value players.

 

[burmafrd]

Brockers that high after stinking it up?

 

[Deep_Freeze]

It's not a mock draft. It's a player ranking. It is weird, though, to notice the big difference between where players get ranked and where teams take them. It shows both that teams talk a mean BPA game but rarely follow up and how differently individuals -- teams, experts and journalists alike -- value players.

Yeah in a first round pick BPA always sounds good, but really with a pick that high, need still has to be a factor in the equation.

Course it is easier to sell the fans on the fact that the organization thought whoever they picked was the BPA, and most will believe it as gospel.

 

[marchetta]

yep, some pretty big shockers there

more and more i am thinking that dallas will take DL or OLB at 14 (unless if they trade down)

with Poe, Ingram, Cox, etc available, no way we pass up whoever of these is available

no way we take OL

JMO

They'd have to go DL. If you choose an OLB, who do you sit? Ware or $pencer? If you go OLB, you'd be drafting a part-time player. Or, a player that's so good you have to sit a big money player (ie. $pencer) on the bench. Can't do it. Now, a pass rushing DE is just what we need. And, there's only one worth spending #14 for... and that's Cox. If Cox is gone, and DeCastro is gone, I wouldn't mind Ingram. He could be used as some sort of hybrid DE/OLB where he could be stood up from time-to-time. But my preference is 1) Cox, 2) DeCastro, or 3) Ingram.

 

[jterrell]

Yeah in a first round pick BPA always sounds good, but really with a pick that high, need still has to be a factor in the equation.

Course it is easier to sell the fans on the fact that the organization thought whoever they picked was the BPA, and most will believe it as gospel.

While an extreme example of course would you rather date Lindsey Lohan or Denzel Washington.... No arguing the more highly rated! But if you aren't into guys you just arent into guys....

End of the day beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And while NFL teams may be "playing on the same team" they definitely have some preferences for redheads versus blondes that vary by team....

The Cowboys simply can't justify drafting Trent Richardson for instance. Good player obviously but value is terrible considering Felix and Murray are already here.

 

[cowboysooner]

While an extreme example of course would you rather date Lindsey Lohan or Denzel Washington.... No arguing the more highly rated! But if you aren't into guys you just arent into guys....

End of the day beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And while NFL teams may be "playing on the same team" they definitely have some preferences for redheads versus blondes that vary by team....

The Cowboys simply can't justify drafting Trent Richardson for instance. Good player obviously but value is terrible considering Felix and Murray are already here.

Is Lindsey Lohan Janoris Jenkins in this metaphor?

 

[burmafrd]

Is Lindsey Lohan Janoris Jenkins in this metaphor?

Lindsey has bigger guns

 

[Hoofbite]

Lindsey has bigger guns

She probably has a lot of things that are bigger than his that we don't know about.

I'd bet one of them comes in pairs.

 

[jterrell]

Is Lindsey Lohan Janoris Jenkins in this metaphor?

they have both been busy at the drugstore buffet....