AKATheRake
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,957
- Reaction score
- 2,958
Thumbs up on the original OP. I'd like to add a thing or 2 however that I feel warrants great consideration.
Our defense, although at times seemed very bendable, didn't break once the ball was within our 30 and did not give up a TD forcing FG's instead. Also once in our 30 we were very aggressive and successful at sacking the QB.
So basically, we forced field goals on defense where we could have given up TD's. That's huge. We also seemed much more inclined to create turnovers amongst our front 7. Our tackling is getting much more better. Keep fingers crossed it holds up against Pittsbrugh since we seem to have a harder time tackling against those grindy, physical offenses.
Our defense, although at times seemed very bendable, didn't break once the ball was within our 30 and did not give up a TD forcing FG's instead. Also once in our 30 we were very aggressive and successful at sacking the QB.
So basically, we forced field goals on defense where we could have given up TD's. That's huge. We also seemed much more inclined to create turnovers amongst our front 7. Our tackling is getting much more better. Keep fingers crossed it holds up against Pittsbrugh since we seem to have a harder time tackling against those grindy, physical offenses.