DFWJC
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 59,883
- Reaction score
- 48,673
He did.Diggs had one right in his hands he dropped on the Niners TD drive
and they could've had 4 more that they didn't have.
The defenses carried the day, as the score indicated
He did.Diggs had one right in his hands he dropped on the Niners TD drive
He was probably subtracting injury time, which means Tony started about 8Dak has played 7 seasons
It was an overthrow only because he "pulled up" for no reason. Go ahead and move those goalposts though.He pulled up but was still a overthrow. Game on the line and I'm going to one of the best receivers of all time.....I ain't going to Crayton.....
which still is no half the time as OP said, bunch of nonsense
Welp... as expected, that didn't age wellDak has tied Romo's playoff wins in half the number of years. Romo never advanced beyond the division around. If Dak can get one more playoff win and advance to the NFC championship game, the Prescott-Romo debate can be put to bed forever.
They're exactly the same. End of thread.Exact same playoff record, basically the same thing at this point
To show that it's the organizational structure that is the main problem, not necessarily our last 2 quarterbacksWhy do this?
I was called a Dak apologist......would you be a Romo apologist?Yes you need to stop your non-wholistic comparisons. They’re selective cherry picking nonsense. This team just beat an 8-9 team that would have had no business being in the playoffs during Romo’s time. The so-called GOAT Tom Brady played awful due to the defensive pass rush and shutting the large Bucs’ receivers down. Romo was on one of the worst defenses of all time, along with just other bad defenses during his “prime” years. Even in the playoffs against Minnesota in 2009 where the team manhandled the Eagles the previous week, his offensive line was a sieve and plain offensive - 6 sacks and double digit hurries. Nothing Dak has ever had came even close.
....been so since Jimmy was fired.To show that it's the organizational structure that is the main problem, not necessarily our last 2 quarterbacks
Apologist just means someone who defends someone or something with argumentation.I was called a Dak apologist......would you be a Romo apologist?
I think some fans are either too young or just gloss over the stuff Romo had to put up with. A really woeful OLine.. and then when he finally did get an Oline.. our defence was putrid.. and then when we started to get the two phases working.. the injuries starting mounting up for the years he spent getting knocked over every play.Apologist just means someone who defends someone or something with argumentation.
Yes, I thought Romo was a very good QB who Dallas lucked into and whose talent was wasted in Dallas with either incompetent coaching and bad player personnel where it mattered (especially on the lines and depth wise) for years until it was too late. Remember, the GM once said the team doesn’t need an offensive line because of Romo. Garrett was here seven years too long and would’ve been gone with a competent GM. I’m pretty sure most people who look at things objectively do as well.
Can't dispute or be in disagreement......every time I call out KMoore as you did with inclusion of Garrett.....I'm an apologist. Somebody's head has to roll, at some point. KMoore and Philbin need to be called out. I need a QB getting better, not getting worse. I need an OL getting better, not being immuned due to past reputations of guys that aren't on the team now.Apologist just means someone who defends someone or something with argumentation.
Yes, I thought Romo was a very good QB who Dallas lucked into and whose talent was wasted in Dallas with either incompetent coaching and bad player personnel where it mattered (especially on the lines and depth wise) for years until it was too late. Remember, the GM once said the team doesn’t need an offensive line because of Romo. Garrett was here seven years too long and would’ve been gone with a competent GM. I’m pretty sure most people who look at things objectively do as well.
.....the excuse making for TRomo mistakes continue. Garrett failed, just as KMoore is failing too or being routinely exposed. If Dak, the 7 year vet has fallen off the cliff, KMoore is right there with him. They are connected. I'd have more respect if I heard KMoore was in Philbin's rear-end about the OL play too. Too much smiling going on for my liking. Just sayin'.I think some fans are either too young or just gloss over the stuff Romo had to put up with. A really woeful OLine.. and then when he finally did get an Oline.. our defence was putrid.. and then when we started to get the two phases working.. the injuries starting mounting up for the years he spent getting knocked over every play.
I have zero doubt.. that a fit Romo would have won with the team we put out against SF. No doubt.
I also believe Romo would have got us very very close to a ring in 2016.. if not won it all. How history was shaped because of our incompetent HC and GM.
Oh please do not think I am a Moore fan.. I think he is a big cause of a lot of issues. I hate his scheme.. hate his play calling. I'd be happy for both of them to go. Tomorrow......the excuse making for TRomo mistakes continue. Garrett failed, just as KMoore is failing too or being routinely exposed. If Dak, the 7 year vet has fallen off the cliff, KMoore is right there with him. They are connected. I'd have more respect if I heard KMoore was in Philbin's rear-end about the OL play too. Too much smiling going on for my liking. Just sayin'.