Twitter: Prescott's rating on passes 20+ yards to Lamb

[J12B]

 

[Hawkeye19]

 

[CowboyRoy]

Despite what the trolls claimed, Dak is one of the best long ball passers in the NFL.

 

[Tangle_Foot]

That's pretty impressive and promising for the future.

Dak. The styling, profiling, limousine riding, jet flying, kiss stealing, wheeling dealing son of a gun.

Wooooo!!

 

[CowboyFrog]

That's pretty impressive and promising for the future.

Dak The styling, profiling, limousine riding, jet flying, kiss stealing, wheeling dealing son of a gun.

Wooooo!!

Hey easy with the Kiss stealing thats not far from indecent message behavior.........just saying

 

[garyo1954]

We need some qualifiers here. Hard to be excited about it until we know more.
There is only 4 Dak to Lamb completions that covered 20 yards (that I can find).
1 vs the Falcons in the 4th qtr
2 vs Giants (1 in the 2nd another in the third)
1 vs Seattle in the third

Is that all the targets?

 

[CowboyRoy]

We need some qualifiers here. Hard to be excited about it until we know more.
There is only 4 Dak to Lamb completions that covered 20 yards (that I can find).
1 vs the Falcons in the 4th qtr
2 vs Giants (1 in the 2nd another in the third)
1 vs Seattle in the third

Is that all the targets?

Why do we need qualifiers? You mean you feel the need to try and find ways to discredit that facts?

 

[garyo1954]

Why do we need qualifiers? You mean you feel the need to try and find ways to discredit that facts?

Maybe because you'd like to know if the statement is true. Simply put 4 complete passes for 20 yards may not be the total number of targets. And maybe the whole picture would give a better idea of how well that stat stands up.

The statement is unproven until we know the number of 20+ targets CeeDee Lamb had in those 5 games. Do you have that stat?
In any case, you aren't smart enough to read minds little big man. So put your motives issue aside until you prove the statement true.

 

[Aerolithe_Lion]

Why do we need qualifiers? You mean you feel the need to try and find ways to discredit that facts?

Because stats don’t have meaning without context. We all hope for meaning

 

[Redball Express]

Wish they had a " scratch my head" emoticon. This one would get it. So your point is what?

 

[CalPolyTechnique]

Dak is leading the league in completion percentage when throwing to receivers with the first name of CeeDee in the 4th quarter.

 

[J12B]

Wish they had a " scratch my head" emoticon. This one would get it. So your point is what?

Try thinking a little harder.

 

[buybuydandavis]

We need some qualifiers here. Hard to be excited about it until we know more.
There is only 4 Dak to Lamb completions that covered 20 yards (that I can find).
1 vs the Falcons in the 4th qtr
2 vs Giants (1 in the 2nd another in the third)
1 vs Seattle in the third

Is that all the targets?

Bingo. It's great that it worked so well, and we should probably try it more this year, but the sample size is surely miniscule.

 

[Hardline]

Wish they had a " scratch my head" emoticon. This one would get it. So your point is what?

 

[Jarntt]

in 5 games? OK. I guess that's good news for June...

 

[CowboyFrog]

J12B dont let anyone get ya down, you put a positive tweet about our QB and rookie WR on the fan forum. I like that stat wether its 5 times or 20 bodes well for the future. They may not be Montana to Rice yet but so far they are off to a good start...well except the broken ankle thing...but BEFORE that they were off to a good start!!!

 

[CowboyRoy]

Maybe because you'd like to know if the statement is true. Simply put 4 complete passes for 20 yards may not be the total number of targets. And maybe the whole picture would give a better idea of how well that stat stands up.

The statement is unproven until we know the number of 20+ targets CeeDee Lamb had in those 5 games. Do you have that stat?
In any case, you aren't smart enough to read minds little big man. So put your motives issue aside until you prove the statement true.

Im sure its a statement you are wishing isnt true. Some people might look really dumb it if was.

 

[CowboyRoy]

Because stats don’t have meaning without context. We all hope for meaning

Are you implying they are lying?

Do those stats make you feel silly? Trying sooo hard to hope its not true.

You really are a quality fan. Cowboys need more fans like you.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

Are you implying they are lying?

Do those stats make you feel silly? Trying sooo hard to hope its not true.

You really are a quality fan. Cowboys need more fans like you.

He's not a Cowboys fan. He has admitted to that. Pay attention, Roy.

He's right though and he usually always backs the things up he says. If this was something negative about Dak you'd be the first person looking for context on the numbers. It works both ways.

 

[CowboyRoy]

He's not a Cowboys fan. He has admitted to that. Pay attention, Roy.

He's right though and he usually always backs the things up he says. If this was something negative about Dak you'd be the first person looking for context on the numbers. It works both ways.

When are you going to admit you arent a Cowboys fan?

If someone posts positive numbers about the cowboys I dont run around trying to discredit them. Thats what trolls like you do.