Pro Bowl QB

Munchis

New Member
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
These are the numbers a pro bowl QB puts up in the month of december?

http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/396886/gamelogs/2006

4 TD's, 7 INT's, 9 sacks, 68.3 QB rating, 3 lost fumbles....sure looks like a superstar to me.

Also in 3 of the last four games his QB rating was 58.8 or lower.

Pathetic, but this is the QB that is supposed to be better than Bledsoe.

Munchis....Out!!!
 

smarta5150

Mr. Wright
Messages
7,163
Reaction score
0
More hate.

Not gonna fall for it Munchis.

Tell us how many passes VS rushes in those games please.
 

Munchis

New Member
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
alancdc;1262862 said:
It's Groundhog Day starring Munchis as Bill Murray!

3-3 VS 7-3? What is the problem?

Bledsoe was 3-2, Romo is 6-4....don't get ahead of yourself either because the detroit game is far from a gimme givin the way Romo and the defense are playing.

Munchis...Out!!
 

alancdc

Active Member
Messages
3,295
Reaction score
5
Munchis;1262870 said:
Bledsoe was 3-2, Romo is 6-4....don't get ahead of yourself either because the detroit game is far from a gimme givin the way Romo and the defense are playing.

Munchis...Out!!

We are still blaming the Giants game on Romo? I often wonder if Drew hadn't made that Bledsoe esque interception at the goal line when exactly would Romo have been incerted? I would say when we were a solid 6-6? How about you?
 

LeonDixson

Illegitimi non carborundum
Messages
12,299
Reaction score
6,808
alancdc;1262880 said:
We are still blaming the Giants game on Romo? I often wonder if Drew hadn't made that Bledsoe esque interception at the goal line when exactly would Romo have been incerted? I would say when we were a solid 6-6? How about you?

Look, I'm firmly behind Romo. Don't ever want to go back to Bledsoe. BUT... the Giants game was more Romo's fault than it was Bledsoe's. We lost ground, score wise, when Romo came in. I understand that it was his 1st meaningful playing time and mistakes could be expected, but that doesn't change the fact that we lost the 2nd half by more than we lost the 1st half.
 

cowboys19

New Member
Messages
1,577
Reaction score
0
LeonDixson;1262898 said:
Look, I'm firmly behind Romo. Don't ever want to go back to Bledsoe. BUT... the Giants game was more Romo's fault than it was Bledsoe's. We lost ground, score wise, when Romo came in. I understand that it was his 1st meaningful playing time and mistakes could be expected, but that doesn't change the fact that we lost the 2nd half by more than we lost the 1st half.

we were already losing, so romo couldn't have lost us the game
 

cowboys19

New Member
Messages
1,577
Reaction score
0
Mods ban this guy named Munchies, cant you see all he does is start trouble?

if you cant see that then whatever
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Munchis;1262870 said:
Bledsoe was 3-2, Romo is 6-4....don't get ahead of yourself either because the detroit game is far from a gimme givin the way Romo and the defense are playing.

Munchis...Out!!
Romo is 6-3 as a starter. He was the best player on the team in 2 of those losses.
 

Jimz31

The Sarcastic One
Messages
14,388
Reaction score
231
LeonDixson;1262898 said:
Look, I'm firmly behind Romo. Don't ever want to go back to Bledsoe. BUT... the Giants game was more Romo's fault than it was Bledsoe's. We lost ground, score wise, when Romo came in. I understand that it was his 1st meaningful playing time and mistakes could be expected, but that doesn't change the fact that we lost the 2nd half by more than we lost the 1st half.

How many wins would we currently have if Bledsoe was still in there? 3 more? MAYBE? I doubt it.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
LeonDixson;1262898 said:
Look, I'm firmly behind Romo. Don't ever want to go back to Bledsoe. BUT... the Giants game was more Romo's fault than it was Bledsoe's. We lost ground, score wise, when Romo came in. I understand that it was his 1st meaningful playing time and mistakes could be expected, but that doesn't change the fact that we lost the 2nd half by more than we lost the 1st half.
Wow, you would actually blame the guy for the loss when came in cold at half-time and was asked to throw 20+ consecutive attempts on his first ever action in a real game?
 

Cajuncowboy

Preacher From The Black Lagoon
Messages
27,499
Reaction score
81
Munchis;1262859 said:
These are the numbers a pro bowl QB puts up in the month of december?

http://www.nfl.com/players/playerpage/396886/gamelogs/2006

4 TD's, 7 INT's, 9 sacks, 68.3 QB rating, 3 lost fumbles....sure looks like a superstar to me.

Also in 3 of the last four games his QB rating was 58.8 or lower.

Pathetic, but this is the QB that is supposed to be better than Bledsoe.

Munchis....Out!!!

Sooooo, you thought we were better off with Mr. Statue?
 

LeonDixson

Illegitimi non carborundum
Messages
12,299
Reaction score
6,808
Jimz31;1262911 said:
How many wins would we currently have if Bledsoe was still in there? 3 more? MAYBE? I doubt it.

Read my post, Jim. I'm firmly behind Romo. He's done much, much better than I expect Bledsoe would have. That wasn't the issue I addressed.
 

irvin88

Active Member
Messages
1,668
Reaction score
0
Romo has come back to earth a little bit, but I still have faith. I know this: He's costing himself a TON of $$$ right now.
 

LeonDixson

Illegitimi non carborundum
Messages
12,299
Reaction score
6,808
theogt;1262914 said:
Wow, you would actually blame the guy for the loss when came in cold at half-time and was asked to throw 20+ consecutive attempts on his first ever action in a real game?

Can't you guys read??? I said in my post that mistakes could have been expected in his first meaningful action, didn't I. I just pointed out that we lost the second half by more than we did the first half. Are you saying that Bledsoe lost the game by his one interception??? If your scoring a baseball game then you're absolutely correct.
 

Jimz31

The Sarcastic One
Messages
14,388
Reaction score
231
LeonDixson;1262922 said:
Read my post, Jim. I'm firmly behind Romo. He's done much, much better than I expect Bledsoe would have. That wasn't the issue I addressed.

Why even bring that game up? He was the backup coming into a game where during practice he wasn't even getting very many reps.

That game shouldn't even be brought up just like. Just like someone posted earlier...he came in and had to throw, throw, throw.....
 

Jimz31

The Sarcastic One
Messages
14,388
Reaction score
231
LeonDixson;1262934 said:
Can't you guys read??? I said in my post that mistakes could have been expected in his first meaningful action, didn't I. I just pointed out that we lost the second half by more than we did the first half. Are you saying that Bledsoe lost the game by his one interception??? If your scoring a baseball game then you're absolutely correct.

It seems as though you are trying to pin that loss squarely on Romo's shoulders. If mistakes can be expected, then why even bring up the game?
 

LeonDixson

Illegitimi non carborundum
Messages
12,299
Reaction score
6,808
Jimz31;1262935 said:
Why even bring that game up? He was the backup coming into a game where during practice he wasn't even getting very many reps.

That game shouldn't even be brought up just like. Just like someone posted earlier...he came in and had to throw, throw, throw.....

I didn't bring it up. I responded to a post that brought it up.
 

Concord

Mr. Buckeye
Messages
12,825
Reaction score
119
Romo is not the problem.

Lets start with the Defense first and then blame other people.
 
Top