Putty's too early 53

[waldoputty]

on the bubble: rush or white for qb2, edwards or another developmental ol, wilson or twill for wr, ward or crawford for dl, gregory or neal for de, covington or ufa lb, white or thomas for cb5, and additional s from ufa or fa.

offense (25)
qb (2): dak, (rush or white)
rb (3): zeke, austin, smith
fb: (1): olawale
ol (9): tfred, tsmith, martin, collins, williams, fleming, looney, mmartin, (edwards)
te (4): rico, jarwin, schultz, swaim
wr (6): hurns, gallup, thompson, brown, beas, (wilson or twill)

defense: (25)
dt (5): collins, irving, price, ash, (ward or crawford)
de (5): dlaw, taco, armstrong, ealy, (hopefully gregory if not then neal)
lb (6): lee, smith, vander esch, thomas, wilson, (covington or ufa)
s (4): woods, frazer, heath (ufa or fa)
ca (5): awuzie, lewis, jones, brown, (white or thomas)

special teams: (3)

 

[tm1119]

So you have Ash making the 53 over Crawford? You can’t be serious

 

[waldoputty]

So you have Ash making the 53 over Crawford? You can’t be serious

if ward can perform about the same as crawford, then i see crawford as casualty unless he reduces his salary

 

[jday]

on the bubble: rush or white for qb2, edwards or another developmental ol, wilson or twill for wr, ward or crawford for dl, gregory or neal for de, covington or ufa lb, white or thomas for cb5, and additional s from ufa or fa.

offense (25)
qb (2): dak, (rush or white)
rb (3): zeke, austin, smith
fb: (1): olawale
ol (9): tfred, tsmith, martin, collins, williams, fleming, looney, mmartin, (edwards)
te (4): rico, jarwin, schultz, swaim
wr (6): hurns, gallup, thompson, brown, beas, (wilson or twill)

defense: (25)
dt (5): collins, irving, price, ash, (ward or crawford)
de (5): dlaw, taco, armstrong, ealy, (hopefully gregory if not then neal)
lb (6): lee, smith, vander esch, thomas, wilson, (covington or ufa)
s (4): woods, frazer, heath (ufa or fa)
ca (5): awuzie, lewis, jones, brown, (white or thomas)

special teams: (3)

No Bo? Oh no!

 

[Sydla]

if ward can perform about the same as crawford, then i see crawford as casualty unless he reduces his salary

He won’t reduce his salary. Why would he?

The Crawford hate and desire to kick him off the teamis easily one of the more bizarre things one reads around here.

 

[VACowboy]

I think they keep three QBs, at least for a while. I could also totally see Wilson pushing Thompson off the 53. When it comes to WR I think there are very few guaranteed slots and will be completely unsurprised to see heads roll in training camp. It's not just the names that are changing. The philosophy is changing too. They could have easily traded up to ensure getting Sutton but chose instead to stay put and pick Gallup instead, a nod to the importance of route-running instead of size and physicality. I think Ward is going to get a good long chance to prove himself and Shultz is going to play more than most folks think because he's a great blocker and a better receiver than he gets credit for being. Overall, they will go long in some spots and perilously short in others on the initial 53 as they try to avoid losing players they see a future for in Dallas. I think Ash and Neil easily make the PS and Taco will see snaps at 3-tech, so mebbe they go a bit short at DL.

 

[waldoputty]

I think they keep three QBs, at least for a while. I could also totally see Wilson pushing Thompson off the 53. When it comes to WR I think there are very few guaranteed slots and will be completely unsurprised to see heads roll in training camp. It's not just the names that are changing. The philosophy is changing too. They could have easily traded up to ensure getting Sutton but chose instead to stay put and pick Gallup instead, a nod to the importance of route-running instead of size and physicality. I think Ward is going to get a good long chance to prove himself and Shultz is going to play more than most folks think because he's a great blocker and a better receiver than he gets credit for being. Overall, they will go long in some spots and perilously short in others on the initial 53 as they try to avoid losing players they see a future for in Dallas. I think Ash and Neil easily make the PS and Taco will see snaps at 3-tech, so mebbe they go a bit short at DL.

wr will be wild.
thompson has the most speed other than austin...

 

[Denim Chicken]

wr will be wild.
thompson has the most speed other than austin...

I think Thompson might not make the team, which will be controversial since he has guaranteed $.

 

[DandyTom64]

I cant wait to hear about Bo at camp.

 

[VACowboy]

wr will be wild.
thompson has the most speed other than austin...

I know zip about Thompson except that he's fast, but speed doesn't show in his stats. Here's hoping a change of scenery does him good.

 

[waldoputty]

I think Thompson might not make the team, which will be controversial since he has guaranteed $.

he catches with his hands, probably 2nd fastest wr, runs decent routes.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

if ward can perform about the same as crawford, then i see crawford as casualty unless he reduces his salary

fans hate Crawford because of his salary...the coaches like him. I doubt if he gets cut.

 

[Sydla]

fans hate Crawford because of his salary...the coaches like him. I doubt if he gets cut.

People are blinded by the contract but if you take that out of the equation at this point, he’s a very productive DL for us that does things that don’t show up on stat sheets. He’s a great backup DL at this point.

 

[tm1119]

if ward can perform about the same as crawford, then i see crawford as casualty unless he reduces his salary

Not actually making an internet bet but I'd give you 100 to 1 odds Crawford doesn't get cut. Not even a 5% chance it happens

 

[Manwiththeplan]

on the bubble: rush or white for qb2, edwards or another developmental ol, wilson or twill for wr, ward or crawford for dl, gregory or neal for de, covington or ufa lb, white or thomas for cb5, and additional s from ufa or fa.

offense (25)
qb (2): dak, (rush or white)
rb (3): zeke, austin, smith
fb: (1): olawale
ol (9): tfred, tsmith, martin, collins, williams, fleming, looney, mmartin, (edwards)
te (4): rico, jarwin, schultz, swaim
wr (6): hurns, gallup, thompson, brown, beas, (wilson or twill)

defense: (25)
dt (5): collins, irving, price, ash, (ward or crawford)
de (5): dlaw, taco, armstrong, ealy, (hopefully gregory if not then neal)
lb (6): lee, smith, vander esch, thomas, wilson, (covington or ufa)
s (4): woods, frazer, heath (ufa or fa)
ca (5): awuzie, lewis, jones, brown, (white or thomas)

special teams: (3)

Just throwing it out there, TWill's salary is fully guaranteed. Unless we find a trading partner, we lose money by cutting him.

 

[garyv]

on the bubble: rush or white for qb2, edwards or another developmental ol, wilson or twill for wr, ward or crawford for dl, gregory or neal for de, covington or ufa lb, white or thomas for cb5, and additional s from ufa or fa.

offense (25)
qb (2): dak, (rush or white)
rb (3): zeke, austin, smith
fb: (1): olawale
ol (9): tfred, tsmith, martin, collins, williams, fleming, looney, mmartin, (edwards)
te (4): rico, jarwin, schultz, swaim
wr (6): hurns, gallup, thompson, brown, beas, (wilson or twill)

defense: (25)
dt (5): collins, irving, price, ash, (ward or crawford)
de (5): dlaw, taco, armstrong, ealy, (hopefully gregory if not then neal)
lb (6): lee, smith, vander esch, thomas, wilson, (covington or ufa)
s (4): woods, frazer, heath (ufa or fa)
ca (5): awuzie, lewis, jones, brown, (white or thomas)

special teams: (3)

I think think they keep 3 QB not 2 and only 3 TE not 4

 

[DandyTom64]

Maybe somebody has an idea why it's 53, but I would think 60 would work better for the rosters of every team. Probably already been discussed, I'm new here.

 

[waldoputty]

Maybe somebody has an idea why it's 53, but I would think 60 would work better for the rosters of every team. Probably already been discussed, I'm new here.

it is $