fivetwos
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 22,593
- Reaction score
- 32,004
Knowing where the other side stands before you begin? Yeah, I do.You don’t really think an agent relies on this as part of negotiations.
Knowing where the other side stands before you begin? Yeah, I do.You don’t really think an agent relies on this as part of negotiations.
If he has an All Pro year it will cost A LOT to sign him. If we were to lose him in free agency we’ll get a 5th. If he does have a big year we’ll probably franchise him if we can’t come to an agreement on a new contract.Here's hoping he has an ALL-PRO year.........our options
* Try to sign him to a long-term deal
* franchise tag
* Let him walk.....comp pick
Either way, the better he plays, the better chances of us having more Ws. That's a good thing
Best outcome.........this would mean he had a hell of year.If he does have a big year we’ll probably franchise him if we can’t come to an agreement on a new contract.
If he does have a hell of a year I can’t see us letting him walk unless he causes problems.Best outcome.........this would mean he had a hell of year.
I'm going on record now ........now that we have Pickens, Dak will bounce back and near ALL-PRO level.
Bookmark it.....lol
Could also be a message to Pickens letting him know he’s valued and the team is committed to his success, which is 90% of his issue with the Steelers org who didn’t do anything to help the passing game while he was there.Im just saying it doesn’t HELP negotiations, so why say anything at all?
Could it be about trying to convince everyone you know what you’re doing despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary?
Been saying this for months. CD > TE > everyone else.This is a sales pitch to fans. No way in hell do you take targets away from CeeDee and give them to Pickens.
Lamb can simultaneously handle monster target volume and be top-notch efficient with that volume. He's just a stud. Ferguson will also get the customary Dak TE 60 catches, so Pickens' target share is basically what we threw at Tolbert or Cooks last season.
Pickens isn't really a high-volume guy anyway, so I think he can make do with a limited number of targets. In his 3 years with the Steelers, he caught 52, 63, and 59 passes. But he's got a bonkers 16.3 career YPC.
Exactly. For now, he should be saying things like "guy looking for a change of scenery", "hopeful he can carve out a role"There goes Stevie yet again….
“The starting point is Gurleys deal.”
Etc etc etc etc etc…..
Then expect to sign them cheap.
The biggest downside to this season is that a decent year will have some saying that Dak was somehow a pivotal part of it rather than just along for the ride.Pickens is big for Dak, but having a strong run game would be even bigger.
not surprised at all that you do not get it. Unless the Cowboys have already decided they only want Pickens for this year, they just gave him some very good negotiation leverageMan you guys nick pick everything looking for the negative side of every single thing the Cowboys do.
this is a very fair take. I still think it wasn't wise, but your point is solid.Could also be a message to Pickens letting him know he’s valued and the team is committed to his success, which is 90% of his issue with the Steelers org who didn’t do anything to help the passing game while he was there.
Whine on. It’s what you do best.not surprised at all that you do not get it. Unless the Cowboys have already decided they only want Pickens for this year, they just gave him some very good negotiation leverage
The biggest downside to this season is that a decent year will have some saying that Dak was somehow a pivotal part of it rather than just along for the ride.
Oh, I agree. Just saying that the diehards that want Dak to be better than he is will be acting like any improvement is all him.It's not a shot at Dak. At least thats not my intention. It's not a coincidence Romo was at his best in 2014 with our oline and Demarco bruising defenses.
We need the best version of Dak and I dont think that's flinging the ball 30+ times a game.