Yakuza Rich
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 18,043
- Reaction score
- 12,385
This is something I've wondered about for years.
Every time I read or watch something about the city of Dallas or the JFK assassination, there is always reference to how it galvanized and shaped the city of Dallas in a negative fashion. And how the people of Dallas were horrifically embarrassed by the situation and more or less felt like a laughing stock after the assassination (it sounds like this was up until the 80's when the oil boom hit).
I'm curious as to if this is really true or if this is just media sensationalism?
If it is true, why would the citizens of Dallas be embarrassed by the assassination?
It just seems to me that while I would never want a President assassinated, it was not thru any fault of my own or the city's fault.
Just curious if anybody can provide some insight that I may be missing. Thanks in advance.
YR
Every time I read or watch something about the city of Dallas or the JFK assassination, there is always reference to how it galvanized and shaped the city of Dallas in a negative fashion. And how the people of Dallas were horrifically embarrassed by the situation and more or less felt like a laughing stock after the assassination (it sounds like this was up until the 80's when the oil boom hit).
I'm curious as to if this is really true or if this is just media sensationalism?
If it is true, why would the citizens of Dallas be embarrassed by the assassination?
It just seems to me that while I would never want a President assassinated, it was not thru any fault of my own or the city's fault.
Just curious if anybody can provide some insight that I may be missing. Thanks in advance.
YR