ABQCOWBOY
Regular Joe....
- Messages
- 58,929
- Reaction score
- 27,716
I thought it was more like 5.
LOL.... I thought it was more like whatever a team might be willing to pay but no. I was told that it is 10 million in another thread. IDK.
I thought it was more like 5.
What I am saying is that this idea that it's easier and cheaper to put all these pieces in place around an average QB and harder to just go out and find a better QB might not be accurate.
Code:Pos Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD TD% Int Int% Lng Y/A Y/G Rate QB 308 490 62.9 3324 22 4.5 13 2.7 81 6.8 207.8 86.6
Code:Pos Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD TD% Int Int% Lng Y/A Y/G Rate QB 292 447 65.3 3231 14 3.1 9 2.0 52 7.2 201.9 88.7
One of these is OMG SO TERRIBLE 2017 Dak, and one of these is the Teddy Bridgewater guy everybody is pining after here for some reason.
Teddy Bridgewater hasn’t proven anything. I wouldn't pay him more than he’s making right now.
As far as balanced, I agree. Most of Aikman's career the team was more balanced, but that doesn't take away from his talent and leadership. Romo blew a few opportunities that conveniently get swept under the rug and has always had the luxury of the surrounding talent excuse.All true but I think we should also be fair and admit that Aikman played on far better teams than Romo did.
That's not to say Romo was better, I am not saying that. Just saying that this isn't exactly an apples to apples comparison when looking at post season successes.
It will be harder until 2020.
Right now, moving Collins to G and getting a new RT would fix this line IMO (depending on Fred next year). Grab a vet TE from FA. If we extend Beasley, we're good at WR.
We've seen the list of FA QBs--not a lot of potential there to upgrade. We don't have a #1 in the draft, so the capital to move up a get a top prospect would be astronomical.
In 2020, we'll have a #1 pick and give our 2021 #1 and some change to move to the top and draft Tua, or whomever.
As far as balanced, I agree. Most of Aikman's career the team was more balanced, but that doesn't take away from his talent and leadership. Romo blew a few opportunities that conveniently get swept under the rug and has always had the luxury of the surrounding talent excuse.
There was a significant different between the two QBs performances in the games that mattered the most.
That's not what I said. Romo failed to pull through on a few occasions. This excludes "not having a good enough O line, RB, drops, missed blocks, poor coaching etc....."Nor was that my intention. But it gets tough when you try to pin postseason failures on a QB that played for mediocre coaches and had not so great rosters around him. That's not to slight Aikman who came up big in the postseason and was a great leader, but he got to play for Jimmy Johnson and a loaded roster around him.
That's not what I said. Romo failed to pull through on a few occasions. This excludes "not having a good enough O line, RB, drops, missed blocks, poor coaching etc....."
That's the part that is certainly debatable. But again, he owns his sole mistakes.Romo certainly had his own issues but I still contend his lack of postseason success over the years was more tied to flawed rosters and mediocre coaching than just Romo himself.
They needed more than Frederick back. They just traded a #1 pick for a WR that they are going to now have to pay $15MM a year. And they probably could still use another WR. And then we have the wasteland that is TE. Further, we may need a LT as well.
What I am saying is that this idea that it's easier and cheaper to put all these pieces in place around an average QB and harder to just go out and find a better QB might not be accurate.
I agree. He's in his 4th NFL season and hasn't yet had even one quality NFL season. Who knows if he would have without the injury, but the fact remains that he hasn't.
The cap is 200m...... it is not relevant anymoreThey needed more than Frederick back. They just traded a #1 pick for a WR that they are going to now have to pay $15MM a year. And they probably could still use another WR. And then we have the wasteland that is TE. Further, we may need a LT as well.
What I am saying is that this idea that it's easier and cheaper to put all these pieces in place around an average QB and harder to just go out and find a better QB might not be accurate.
Romo wasn't completely Romo in his 3rd year. What was his stats those 3 yearsthe difference between Dak and Romo was that Romo made the players around him better, The players around Dak make him better and that is the problem, no Dak hate or Romo love just happens to be the way it is. So far neither has done much in the play-offs .
Dak is only 25..... he is a pup.... a puppy with big paws but still a pupRomo wasn't completely Romo in his 3rd year. What was his stats those 3 years
He's only had two NFL seasons and they were both quality for what was asked of him. Not sure what you mean.
Was Romo a 2nd tier QB?
No doubt but my point is folks are saying what all these other QBs are but that's their entire career. Of course Dak isn't on that level yet but doesn't mean he can'tDak is only 25..... he is a pup.... a puppy with big paws but still a pup
He should have won it over Rodgers. Romo was there a few times but the media perception kept him from winning itGee, it sure seems like Tony Romo was a solid contender for NFL MVP back in 2014. I guess that award routinely sees second-tier QBs receiving consideration.