Rams are Legit!

ConstantReboot

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,633
Reaction score
11,506
Fisher is really a great coach.

Their oline is worst than ours. Seattle made a living in the Rams backfield. Yet the Rams adjusted with rollouts, play action, screens, quick counts, etc. They did everything they could to slow the Seattle passrush and it worked.

Their defense played it smart also. Although Lynch racked up a ton of yardage, they blitzed Wilson and didn't give him time to throw at all. They lost this game cause they blitzed Wilson at lot and didn't give him time.

St. Louis doesn't even have half the talent we have on our offense. Their oline is awful. However, they find ways to win.

There is no way they should have won this game on paper. But that what a coach will do for your team. Fisher has really turned that team around. As for our coaching, after watching this game, I certainly have doubts.
 
Also helps to get Seattle on the road instead of at their loud stadium.
 
Chuck 54;4758930 said:
Also helps to get Seattle on the road instead of at their loud stadium.

Yeah. It's like such a completely different situation that it should have prevented anyone from starting such a thread.
 
BTW, the "legit" Rams will be picking in the top 10 of the draft next spring.
 
Risen Star;4758946 said:
BTW, the "legit" Rams will be picking in the top 10 of the draft next spring.

Rams won today against a team we could have won against, even though it was in Seattle. Our excuses for losing is getting old. this thing about our oline are nothing more than excuses for not being able to coach a win.

Rams won because of coaching. I don't care if they are devoid of talent. When was the last time our team won because of coaching?
 
Yeah, I don't really think the Rams are legit just because they beat the Seahawks. Seahawks shouldn't even have beat the Packers. Only team they really beat this year was us. There's so much parity in the league, especially in the NFC West. If you want to be making threads about surprising teams, what about the freakin Vikings? I'm kinda shocked.
 
big dog cowboy;4758986 said:
Seattle at home>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Seattle on the road

Did you watch the game? Seattle's defense manhandled the Rams offense. They racked up a ton of yards on the ground against the Rams. The Rams shouldn't have won but they outcoached the Seahawks. Coaching played a big part in their upset more so than homefield advantage.
 
ConstantReboot;4759026 said:
Did you watch the game? Seattle's defense manhandled the Rams offense. They racked up a ton of yards on the ground against the Rams. The Rams shouldn't have won but they outcoached the Seahawks. Coaching played a big part in their upset more so than homefield advantage.

That wasn't the same Seahawk team that derailed us. They are just a different team on the road.
 
Until Seattle get better QB play (they're on the right track) every game will be close. Their D will keep them in games like the GB and Cowboys and but their lack of offense will keep teams like the Rams in games as well so it can go both ways against good or bad teams
 
I guess a "Seahawks aren't legit" thread would get merged?
 
Risen Star;4758946 said:
BTW, the "legit" Rams will be picking in the top 10 of the draft next spring.

Because they have the Commanders pick...
 
big dog cowboy;4759147 said:
That wasn't the same Seahawk team that derailed us. They are just a different team on the road.

This wasn't the Garrett led Cowboys either.
 
Rams are weak! Just because they beat a team that killed us doesnt make them legit. We might not be legit.
 
So the Seahawks beat the cowboys, then lost to the rams, who lost to detroit, who lost to the vikings, who lost to the colts, who lost the jaguars, who lost to the bengals, who lost to the ravens, who lost to eagles, who lost to arizona, who's undefeated! So I guess that means we're in the middle of the pack?

Glad we could clear that up.
 
Back
Top