Randle El...

cowboyfan4life_mark

5 outta 8 ain't bad
Messages
3,037
Reaction score
125
Update: Randle El, who will be a free agent after the season, will be the Bears' top priority this offseason, the Chicago Tribune reports.

Recommendation: In addition to giving the Bears another speed receiver, Randle El also could be the third-string quarterback on game days, saving the team an active roster spot. Though the former Hoosier's recent success likely has driven up his asking price, Chicago is in excellent salary-cap shape and will be willing to pay top dollar for this versatile talent.



Still would like to have him but I just don't see the Cowboys really going after him.

If Chicago could get him, with already having Muhammad, Chicago could really produce again next year.
 

kingwhicker

BCRSA
Messages
3,290
Reaction score
0
I'd be surprised if Cowher lets him get out of Pittsburgh- however, if they win the SB, Rooney might have a fire sale- dunno about that guy- he's not the wealthiest owner and the city is pretty dirt poor, so who knows?
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,918
Reaction score
112,947
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
cowboyfan4life_mark said:
If Chicago could get him, with already having Muhammad, Chicago could really produce again next year.
Produce? Chicago was offensively challenged last year. Big Time. They only outscored 5 teams.
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,971
Reaction score
26,616
the 3rd qb is not an active roster spot player. he becomes active if he is put in a game and then the other guy can't come back. so it's no real, help except for trick plays. he's a nice reciever but this draft has some nice recievers for alot less money
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,393
I really like this kid -- so long as we understand that he's a #2 receiver and he should be paid that sort of money. But someone is going to give him #1 receiver money. And he'll flop in that role -- just like every #2 or #3 guy who got paid to be a #1.

I wish we would have traded up a couple more spots in 2002 to grab him instead of Bryant.
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,971
Reaction score
26,616
i believe he meant they only outscored 5 teams for the season, meaning only 5 teams scored less points for the season than they did
 

Bryan8284

Active Member
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0
No, total points. Only had more points than five other teams (for whole season).

I think that is what he is trying to say.
 

Sarge

Red, White and Brew...
Staff member
Messages
33,773
Reaction score
31,541
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
abersonc said:
I really like this kid -- so long as we understand that he's a #2 receiver... .

Ya - that'd be great - we'd then have 18 #2 receivers and no #1's.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,393
Sarge said:
Ya - that'd be great - we'd then have 18 #2 receivers and no #1's.

well, our other #2s aren't getting any younger. and our #1 receiver is Witten.
 

GoDallas

Active Member
Messages
113
Reaction score
95
Randle El will cost too much & will NOT be worth the money (IMO).

Also, after every pass that he doesn't catch, he is probably the WORSE player always asking for a flag. I see most Pittsburgh games (except when Dallas plays at the same time) & it is comical - even all my Steeler friends laugh because if Randle El doesn't catch it, he is yelling at the refs. Many others do it too BUT he is doing it all the time & it really gets annoying.

In the Super Bowl, watch him ask for a flag after Ben throws a pass 10 feet over his head (if Ben should happen to impersonate Slash on a play). You will be laughing along with me.
 

dbair1967

Arch Defender
Messages
30,782
Reaction score
1
abersonc said:
I really like this kid -- so long as we understand that he's a #2 receiver and he should be paid that sort of money. But someone is going to give him #1 receiver money. And he'll flop in that role -- just like every #2 or #3 guy who got paid to be a #1.

I wish we would have traded up a couple more spots in 2002 to grab him instead of Bryant.

its always easy to play the hindsight game...at the time getting Antonio Bryant where we got him appeared to be a major, major steal

David
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
Sarge said:
Ya - that'd be great - we'd then have 18 #2 receivers and no #1's.

We would also have a dynamic special teamer who could be our number two after we take a number one in the future.

Coach Parcells has raved about him in the past.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,393
dbair1967 said:
its always easy to play the hindsight game...at the time getting Antonio Bryant where we got him appeared to be a major, major steal

David

no, he appeared to be a talented guy who dropped because of his questionable attitude. no one doubted his first round talent - but many teams didn't want the headache. he was expected to fall and he did. he might have been there in round 3 too. after the steelers passed on him most teams figured they knew something.
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,953
Reaction score
23,101
If I had the hindsight, I would rather have drafted Deion Branch. He wasn't even on my radar.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
cowboyfan4life_mark said:
Update: Randle El, who will be a free agent after the season, will be the Bears' top priority this offseason, the Chicago Tribune reports.

Recommendation: In addition to giving the Bears another speed receiver, Randle El also could be the third-string quarterback on game days, saving the team an active roster spot. Though the former Hoosier's recent success likely has driven up his asking price, Chicago is in excellent salary-cap shape and will be willing to pay top dollar for this versatile talent.



Still would like to have him but I just don't see the Cowboys really going after him.

If Chicago could get him, with already having Muhammad, Chicago could really produce again next year.

oh well, guess we're gonna have to take Sinorice MOss in the draft hehe
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
abersonc said:
I really like this kid -- so long as we understand that he's a #2 receiver and he should be paid that sort of money. But someone is going to give him #1 receiver money. And he'll flop in that role -- just like every #2 or #3 guy who got paid to be a #1.

I wish we would have traded up a couple more spots in 2002 to grab him instead of Bryant.

Obviously, Bryant didn't work out in Dallas, but he has still produced more than Randle-El. I am not sure if Dallas would be any better now with Randle-El or really any of the other receivers drafted in the first two rounds that year.

Antwaan Randle-El
162 receptions
2012 yards
7 TDs

Antonio Bryant
210 receptions
3104 yards
16 TDs

Donte Stallworth
195 receptions
2791 yards
23 TDs

Ashley Leilie
168 receptions
3007 yards
12 TDs
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,393
joseephuss said:
Obviously, Bryant didn't work out in Dallas, but he has still produced more than Randle-El. I am not sure if Dallas would be any better now with Randle-El or really any of the other receivers drafted in the first two rounds that year.

Production is relative though. Bryant has a knack for picking up lots of yards in garbage time. Also, he produces problems and requires constant attention from the staff and, sometimes other players. He's the only one of those 4 guys who insists on being "the guy" rather than being a role player.

Though when you talk about Randal-El, you need to acknowledge he 3300 plus yards of kickoff and punt returns, and the 5 tds he's scored in that capacity.
 
Top