waving monkey
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 15,540
- Reaction score
- 14,930
After penning a lament for Jason Garrett deserving a much higher rank than others want to give him, it warranted another column explaining the methods. In the middle of the offseason, we seem to have a lot of ranking pieces that come out, and the head coaching ranks always draw attention. So, where does every coach belong going into 2017? More importantly, how should a head coach’s rank be determined in the first place?
As mentioned previously, it’s not as simple as some sites make it out to be by ranking these coaches by tenure. Some coaches have had success earlier in their careers and have fallen off the pedestal a bit. Others have struggled with their first opportunities and have become late bloomers.
The best method in how to rank these coaches is by looking at the staff they have built plus the current talent on the roster. To be clear, this is not a ranking of these coaches based solely on their career achievements, this is a ranking of where they are going into this season. Without further ado, here’s how these coaches stack up for the 2017 season
https://www.bloggingtheboys.com/201...ess-jason-garrett-bill-belichick-pete-carroll
As mentioned previously, it’s not as simple as some sites make it out to be by ranking these coaches by tenure. Some coaches have had success earlier in their careers and have fallen off the pedestal a bit. Others have struggled with their first opportunities and have become late bloomers.
The best method in how to rank these coaches is by looking at the staff they have built plus the current talent on the roster. To be clear, this is not a ranking of these coaches based solely on their career achievements, this is a ranking of where they are going into this season. Without further ado, here’s how these coaches stack up for the 2017 season
https://www.bloggingtheboys.com/201...ess-jason-garrett-bill-belichick-pete-carroll