Ravens thought Pryce would re-sign

Arch Stanton

it was the grave marked unknown right beside
Messages
6,474
Reaction score
0
Ravens thought Pryce would re-sign

Posted by Mike Florio on September 30, 2010 2:06 PM ET
The 54-man roster trick has only one design flaw. In order to dump a vested veteran and bring him back the following week, the vested veteran must not sign with another team in the interim.

And that's precisely what defensive lineman Trevor Pryce has done a day after being cut by the Ravens. As first reported by Ravens linebacker Terrell Suggs and confirmed by PFT, Pryce has defected to the Jets.

It's our understanding that the Ravens had an understanding with Pryce that he'd be coming back. Any such arrangement would be unenforceable at best, a violation of Article XXV, Section 1 of the CBA at worst; NFL spokesman Greg Aiello has confirmed that a team cannot promise to re-sign a player at a later date. Nevertheless, Mike Lombardi of NFL Network calls Pryce's decision to sign with the Jets "serious," and he suggests that the Ravens "won't be doing a deal anytime in the near future" with Lamont Smith and Peter Schaffer of All Pro Sports & Entertainment, the agents who represent Pryce.

Read more:http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/09/30/ravens-thought-pryce-would-re-sign/
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,198
Messages
14,520,293
Members
24,208
Latest member
CowboysQC
Back
Top