RB Tandem Stats (NFC)

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Vintage;1545077 said:
Against Philly, Jones had 10 carries for 38 yards while Barber had 6 carries for 3 yards.

Against Detroit, Jones had 10 carries for 27 yards and Barber had 7 carries for 15 yards.

In both games, when they did run the ball, they got no production.

you think at the most, 10 carries, is enough to get a back into rythm?
 

Vintage

The Cult of Jib
Messages
16,717
Reaction score
4,890
Bob Sacamano;1545293 said:
you think at the most, 10 carries, is enough to get a back into rythm?

I think its enough to do better than that, certainly. Its not like JJ is a back who relies upon wearing down opponents in the 4th Q.
 

Stautner

New Member
Messages
10,691
Reaction score
1
nyc;1545281 said:
Well, they said they were going to throw the ball down field much more than last year. They said TO and Glenn will attack defenses deep a lot more in 2007.

Who is "they" and where did "they" say it? I haven't seen or read about Garrett saying it - or Phillips, but maybe I've missed something.

Your only indication before was that it was the "word on the street" ......
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Vintage;1545296 said:
I think its enough to do better than that, certainly. Its not like JJ is a back who relies upon wearing down opponents in the 4th Q.

10 carries is not alot, I wouldn't be basing my beliefs on those
 

Vintage

The Cult of Jib
Messages
16,717
Reaction score
4,890
Bob Sacamano;1545300 said:
10 carries is not alot, I wouldn't be basing my beliefs on those


So they were running well those two games?
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Vintage;1545302 said:
So they were running well those two games?

obviously not, but I wouldn't be theorizing on the effectiveness of a back on 10 or less carries
 

Vintage

The Cult of Jib
Messages
16,717
Reaction score
4,890
Bob Sacamano;1545303 said:
obviously not, but I wouldn't be theorizing on the effectiveness of a back on 10 or less carries


So then they didn't produce very well then, those 2 games, when running the ball?

(That was what I was saying....and you just agreed with me).

Thanks for playing.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Vintage;1545306 said:
So then they didn't produce very well then, those 2 games, when running the ball?

(That was what I was saying....and you just agreed with me).

Thanks for playing.

someone explained why they didn't play well, not very many carries, and you said, "but still, they should have been doing something w/ them"

and I was just reinforcing why they didn't run well

less carries, so they weren't able to establish a rythm

thank you for not playing well
 
Top