DipChit
New Member
- Messages
- 1,594
- Reaction score
- 0
Why?
Reeves: Proven short term leadership at the top. and he's up for it.
Sparano/Garrett: Continuity plus fresh ideas at OC
Manusky: Up and comer learning under Wade for the last 3 years.
Sure seems like a better plan to me than unproven leadership at the top (Wade/Norv) and using a guy like Bowles as DC whose most recent influence coaching defense is BP/Zim.. even if he'd otherwise be more "aggressive".
Whats wrong with this? Reeves is uh... old?
Whatever... he just turned 63 a week ago not 73.
Reeves: Proven short term leadership at the top. and he's up for it.
Sparano/Garrett: Continuity plus fresh ideas at OC
Manusky: Up and comer learning under Wade for the last 3 years.
Sure seems like a better plan to me than unproven leadership at the top (Wade/Norv) and using a guy like Bowles as DC whose most recent influence coaching defense is BP/Zim.. even if he'd otherwise be more "aggressive".
Whats wrong with this? Reeves is uh... old?
Whatever... he just turned 63 a week ago not 73.