He was drafted as a RB. Numbers for positions are set per league rule.cowboys#1 said:why cant the saints just tag reggie bush as a QB in the roster so he can wear #5? does he have to be considered RB? is this an unwritten rule or something?
cowboys#1 said:why cant the saints just tag reggie bush as a QB in the roster so he can wear #5? does he have to be considered RB? is this an unwritten rule or something?
theogt said:they could teach him how to kick extra points.
Green is listed as a WR...he will have to wear a number in the teens (10-19) or in the eighties (80-89); he can't have number 5 either.peplaw06 said:So Skyler Green (in your sig) will be able to wear #5, but Reggie Bush won't. I'm sorry I just don't see they reasoning behind the NFL being so strict on these numbers.
JackMagist said:Green is listed as a WR...he will have to wear a number in the teens (10-19) or in the eighties (80-89); he can't have number 5 either.
I'll scream bloody murder if Bush is allowed to wear #5. Edgerrin James has lobbied for #5 for YEARS and has repeatedly been shot down. Charles Woodson is lobbying for #2.
Why should the rules change just because a hotshot rookie who HASN'T EVEN PLAYED YET is crying about it?
cowboys#1 said:why cant the saints just tag reggie bush as a QB in the roster so he can wear #5? does he have to be considered RB? is this an unwritten rule or something?
Nav22 said:Why should the rules change just because a hotshot rookie who HASN'T EVEN PLAYED YET is crying about it?
cuz its the middle of may and there isnt anything else to talk about. lay off the crack pipe.Jersey said:Why would ANY Cowboys fan care??? He is dead to us. Maybe the players union should strike until they change the rules.
Want a blast of irony?... It's Pres. Bush's fault he can't wear 5.
There is already a world class loser wearing 5 in phila. Why would RB want to associate himself with a choker??????????
:bang2:
Nav22 said:I'll scream bloody murder if Bush is allowed to wear #5. Edgerrin James has lobbied for #5 for YEARS and has repeatedly been shot down. Charles Woodson is lobbying for #2.
Why should the rules change just because a hotshot rookie who HASN'T EVEN PLAYED YET is crying about it?
yah just let them where what they want then they wouldn't have this kinda stuffpeplaw06 said:So Skyler Green (in your sig) will be able to wear #5, but Reggie Bush won't. I'm sorry I just don't see they reasoning behind the NFL being so strict on these numbers.
In the old days it was about player recognition. It's not really a problem anymore and there's really no need for the rules anymore. Or so they said on Sirius NFL radio today.koolaid said:i dont see why the nfl is so against it, its just a number
cowboys#1 said:why cant the saints just tag reggie bush as a QB in the roster so he can wear #5? does he have to be considered RB? is this an unwritten rule or something?