Report: Raiders are shopping Carr

A lot of people crying about Cooper being awful in Oakland in 2018 and that he was rescued are ignoring a lot of facts.

Fact: Cooper had 100 yds in 2 of 6 games in Oakland (33%). Cooper had 100 yds in 2 of 9 (22%) game in Dallas. *Regular Season
Fact: Cooper barely played in his 6th game in Oakland - 12 Snaps (plenty of which were running plays) - before he left after suffering a head injury. He had a 28 yard catch called back due to a penalty on the OL in the short time he played. So, you could almost say he had 100 yds in 2/5 (40%) of games in Oakland.
Fact: The Raiders had an entirely new offensive system installed.
Fact: In both Oakland and Dallas, Cooper's numbers were mostly feast or famine.
 
I would never pay Dak 25 million, based on what he has done to this point and I would never pay a backup 10 million. We don't have the cap to do that kind of stuff IMO.
That is why I suggested we pay Carr $10 mil (in my scenario) to start instead of paying $25 mil to Dak to start.
 
A lot of people crying about Cooper being awful in Oakland in 2018 and that he was rescued are ignoring a lot of facts.

Fact: Cooper had 100 yds in 2 of 6 games in Oakland (33%). Cooper had 100 yds in 2 of 9 (22%) game in Dallas. *Regular Season
Fact: Cooper barely played in his 6th game in Oakland - 12 Snaps (plenty of which were running plays) - before he left after suffering a head injury. He had a 28 yard catch called back due to a penalty on the OL in the short time he played. So, you could almost say he had 100 yds in 2/5 (40%) of games in Oakland.
Fact: The Raiders had an entirely new offensive system installed.
Fact: In both Oakland and Dallas, Cooper's numbers were mostly feast or famine.

I have thrown hints around here for people to not be upset at Cooper if he can't put up peak Dez Bryant or Miles Austin numbers due to that fact. And with Frederick returning and Linehan out, there's no blaming the OL or the OC.
 
Carr here would be a nightmare for the forum.

People claim Dak "dinks and dunks" when he doesnt, while Carr actually had the shortest throw distance in the league last year. Yet the same ones who claim the dink and dunk want Carr lmao.
hey, but if he can be had for MUCH MUCH cheaper than Daks potential contract there would be less venom.
 
hey, but if he can be had for MUCH MUCH cheaper than Daks potential contract there would be less venom.

He can't though, so I dont really see the need for it to he discussed though, right?

I'm not one to willingly trade for a downgrade at QB on a player that's already on a big contract. Especially a QB that's arguably been bottom five amongst starters the last two-three seasons.
 
He can't though, so I dont really see the need for it to he discussed though, right?

I'm not one to willingly trade for a downgrade at QB on a player that's already on a big contract. Especially a QB that's arguably been bottom five amongst starters the last two-three seasons.
my point is if the cowboys aren't serious about the QB position and believe they can pull a Seattle and put all the support around a young QB (that window is almost over btw) why would we want to break from that mold and overpay for average performance. I thought the goal was to win with a low salary qb. EVEN IF Carr was a drop off it's not going to be that much. We have a system, Carr will do what is asked of Dak, and nothing more.

Just because it's not realistic compared to other scenarios doesn't mean we can't talk about it. We are fans, we have no control on a forum, right? Why talk about anything then since it doesn't matter...
 
If Carr was any better, he wouldn't be getting shopped.
 
Both Carr and Prescott are borderline bottom tier QBs in the league. They are JUST good enough for a starting job.
 
Dak is tons better than Carr. No surprise the Raiders want to get rid of Carr.
 
You wanted to trade for a QB that now nobody wants (at his salary).

Why point out your failed idea?

I said he would become available and I was told he wouldn't. Ironically, now he isn't good enough...
 
my point is if the cowboys aren't serious about the QB position and believe they can pull a Seattle and put all the support around a young QB (that window is almost over btw) why would we want to break from that mold and overpay for average performance. I thought the goal was to win with a low salary qb. EVEN IF Carr was a drop off it's not going to be that much. We have a system, Carr will do what is asked of Dak, and nothing more.

Just because it's not realistic compared to other scenarios doesn't mean we can't talk about it. We are fans, we have no control on a forum, right? Why talk about anything then since it doesn't matter...

You pay an above average QB that is only 25 years old and continue to develop him. We're already right there before his development, with development the sky is the limit.

You dont trade for an awful QB who is older than the incumbent.
 
Everyone make note of the people saying Dak is worse than Carr.

Remember this when discussing future matters with them and know they aren't actually knowledgable of the topic.
 
Carr here would be a nightmare for the forum.

People claim Dak "dinks and dunks" when he doesnt, while Carr actually had the shortest throw distance in the league last year. Yet the same ones who claim the dink and dunk want Carr lmao.

Well he did lose coop.
 
Everyone make note of the people saying Dak is worse than Carr.

Remember this when discussing future matters with them and know they aren't actually knowledgable of the topic.


:rolleyes:





Look at some of the tight windows he throws the ball into.

He’s a better thrower then Dak.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,726
Messages
14,555,137
Members
24,213
Latest member
Debi
Back
Top