Request: Sean Taylor spitting video?

superpunk said:
Try not to get hung up on hyperbole.

It was a valid analogy. Just because one is more serious than the other doesn't mean they don't compare. They do. When someone looks at the analogy, they're not thinking "Yeah, Sean Taylor wanted to kill Pittman." It's about intent.

Punk, you are trying to reason with a Commander mind. I hope you packed a lunch.
 
superpunk said:
Try not to get hung up on hyperbole.

It was a valid analogy. Just because one is more serious than the other doesn't mean they don't compare. They do. When someone looks at the analogy, they're not thinking "Yeah, Sean Taylor wanted to kill Pittman." It's about intent.

yeah after reading what alex said a few more times i can see where you guys are coming from. That being said, you guys sure do love to talk about Taylor heh.
 
apickmans said:
yeah after reading what alex said a few more times i can see where you guys are coming from. That being said, you guys sure do love to talk about Taylor heh.

People are draft to talking about thugs. There are none on the Cowboys so we choose Taylor
 
BigDFan5 said:
People are draft to talking about thugs. There are none on the Cowboys so we choose Taylor

man how long have you as a cowboy fan been waiting to say that about your team?
 
apickmans said:
man how long have you as a cowboy fan been waiting to say that about your team?


I been a Cowboy fan for about 22 years since I was old enough to actually pay attention.

Been able to say that most of those years. Even in the 90's it was a couiple players so the "team" was not a "team full of thugs" it was a team with a couple guys with legal trouble. Even then I don't recall spitting incidents or gun play. I may be wrong
 
BigDFan5 said:
I been a Cowboy fan for about 22 years since I was old enough to actually pay attention.

Been able to say that most of those years. Even in the 90's it was a couiple players so the "team" was not a "team full of thugs" it was a team with a couple guys with legal trouble. Even then I don't recall spitting incidents or gun play. I may be wrong

spitting isnt against the law...and gun play?? what gun play!? Taylor was never found guilty of anything having to do with guns.

also, i never said your team use to be full of thugs, just stating how you have none that we know of on the team right now.
 
apickmans said:
spitting isnt against the law...and gun play?? what gun play!? Taylor was never found guilty of anything having to do with guns.


And OJ is not in jail serving time for killing his wife. :rolleyes:
 
haha i love it when you guys always bring up OJ. Hey, taylor is no angel, but hes not a murderer either.
 
apickmans said:
haha i love it when you guys always bring up OJ. Hey, taylor is not an angel, but hes not a murderer.


Some of you guys just don't understand logic I take it.

Nobody is saying Taylor is a murderer.

They are not saying he shot anyone.

It is called an analogy.

He spit on, or tried to spit on a guy, and some skins fans act like he is just innocent because he didn't get fined.

Point is people are not always found guilty, even though people know they are guilty.

Geez.

You need to go back to art land.
 
Commanders fans are too funny... I actually had a Skins fan in another forum say that "there is no proof that Taylor ever spit".

I showed him the YouTube video of it and he had no choice but to admit he was wrong.... ahhh what fun!
 
BrAinPaiNt said:
Some of you guys just don't understand logic I take it.

Nobody is saying Taylor is a murderer.

They are not saying he shot anyone.

It is called an analogy.

He spit on, or tried to spit on a guy, and some skins fans act like he is just innocent because he didn't get fined.

Point is people are not always found guilty, even though people know they are guilty.

Geez.

You need to go back to art land.

Look i know its an analogy...it just seems like a lot of the posters analogies on this forum have to do with shooting someone or bringing up OJ's deal. Taylor tried to spit on pittman, and he got ejected for that. Almost cost us the game. With all the violent analogies it just seems like you guys are blowing taylor's "thugness" out of proportion. Yeah he is from a rough neighborhood and is friends with people i wish he wasnt, but hopefully this whole incident will make him a better person. Hopefully the possibly of serving jail time has scared him straight.
 
apickmans said:
Look i know its an analogy...it just seems like a lot of the posters analogies on this forum have to do with shooting someone or bringing up OJ's deal. Taylor tried to spit on pittman, and he got ejected for that. Almost cost us the game. With all the violent analogies it just seems like you guys are blowing taylor's "thugness" out of proportion. Yeah he is from a rough neighborhood and is friends with people i wish he wasnt, but hopefully this whole incident will make him a better person. Hopefully the possibly of serving jail time has scared him straight.


Ok...taylor is innocent, like the hot young school teacher was never found guilty of statutory rape.

There is that a little better for you and your boy?:rolleyes:

Furthermore, if you portray yourself as a thug, don't get upset when people call you a thug.
 
BrAinPaiNt said:
Ok...taylor is innocent, like the hot young school teacher was never found guilty of statutory rape.

There is that a little better for you and your boy?:rolleyes:

Furthermore, if you portray yourself as a thug, don't get upset when people call you a thug.

Hey im not upset heh. Why couldnt i have a teacher like that when i was in school?
 
apickmans said:
Hey im not upset heh. Why couldnt i have a teacher like that when i was in school?

That would have been nice :laugh1:
 
apickmans said:
spitting isnt against the law...and gun play?? what gun play!? Taylor was never found guilty of anything having to do with guns.

also, i never said your team use to be full of thugs, just stating how you have none that we know of on the team right now.

No spitting is just classeless, No Taylor plead down so he didnt go to trial on the gun charges.
 
BigDFan5 said:
No spitting is just classeless, No Taylor plead down so he didnt go to trial on the gun charges.

i agree, spitting is classless. I dont know how many times i gotta say that it was wrong of him to do that, and yes i know he plead down.
 
apickmans said:
i agree, spitting is classless. I dont know how many times i gotta say that it was wrong of him to do that, and yes i know he plead down.

I wonder if they will prosecute my dog, Gibbs, for doing this....

:dissskin:

I tried to teach my dog, Gibbs, not to pee pee anymore on the helmet of the Redstinks team...but, he won't listen...once he learned how to pee on that...no going back now.

It's the same with that "punking funk" Taylor...once a thug...always a thug!

I mean, if T.O. cannot change....?

You RedStinks amaze me with your logic..! :cool:
 
Vintage said:
Judging from the trajectory, there must have been a second spitter.

Superb Seinfeld reference my friend! Tip of the cap to you.
 
When the referee ducked out the way he went "back... and to the left"! That was one magic lugi!
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
463,931
Messages
13,777,573
Members
23,770
Latest member
AnthonyDavis
Back
Top