Coogiguy03
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 27,099
- Reaction score
- 22,986
i just dont' get it!I love how we wait for them to get hurt first, then pay them big money.
i just dont' get it!I love how we wait for them to get hurt first, then pay them big money.
paying the players that have been for a while and have caused us to get to the superbowl are more important players who can help you WIN the superbowlCap is not busted even with Dak's contract. Many ways to get the salary cap to 35 to 45 in money. Cap Boy wants you guys to believe this Cap FALSEhood...
what does that even mean when it comes to football?Lol….yeah once Stephen followed Jerry in his interview and said “holistic” I knew it was the buzz word this year!
jerry likes overpaying, it draws attention !!!!!!!!!! people will talk about cowboys lolSo the best way to deal with this is try extending them early if they deserve it but not at max deals. Unless they are the absolute best at their position or a free agent can your teams charles haley then don't pay the max. You negotiate a year early to give yourself time to shop the agent in trade if a good deal can not be reached. Not every good player can make max money. Sometimes you get more from signing multiple guys like gilmore and hankins that are good and won't prevent you from signing or drafting other players.
Besides having a poor GM, most teams would have also fired cap boy himself a long time ago too. Must be making idiotic contracts because as cheap as he is and still 14m over the cap is ridiculous. Tells you how bad of a job he is doing.They have to rework Daks jacked up contract then.
Or just cut him.
Our cap is busted.
We still have time. March will be here soon though.
Negative 14 million as of today.Cap is not busted even with Dak's contract. Many ways to get the salary cap to 35 to 45 in money. Cap Boy wants you guys to believe this Cap FALSEhood...
Zero chance of that happening. The myth floating around this place has been the Cowboys can save $31 or 34 million by cutting him June 1st.They have to rework Daks jacked up contract then.
Or just cut him.
They don’t have to pay his base or the roster bonus.Zero chance of that happening. The myth floating around this place has been the Cowboys can save $31 or 34 million by cutting him June 1st.
That's not how it works. People need to read the fine print on the voided years of 25 and 26 - they only void if Dak is on the roster at the end of 24.
Guess what happens if he's not? Instead of voiding next year it becomes dead cap this year, so you're eating $60 million for a guy you just cut.
That's why cutting Dak in 2024 is a fantasy based on bad information. Don't believe me? It's on Spotrac, but you have to read the fine print.
Dak is not the problem. He is good enough to win a SB.They have to rework Daks jacked up contract then.
Or just cut him.
Our cap is busted.
We still have time. March will be here soon though.
But he hasn’t and he can’t win in the playoffs.Dak is not the problem. He is good enough to win a SB.
No he isn't.Dak is not the problem. He is good enough to win a SB.
Is that based on the 2023 numbers. or 2024 projections. As the 2024 cap has not been announced yet.Our 2024 cap is negative 14 million.
8(
I agree. He should throw in “ smashing” or “superb” once in while too.I hope it replaces the word "super" before everything AND we all stop beginning every dam sentence with the word "So"
I'm going by Spotrac.Is that based on the 2023 numbers. or 2024 projections. As the 2024 cap has not been announced yet.
Just projections. From last I seen the 2024 projections put us under the cap by $25 million. However that was before Dak's reworked contract.
I say, sounds rather cricket to me.I agree. He should throw in “ smashing” or “superb” once in while too.
I love hearing him slur.
I do say myself!I say, sounds rather cricket to me.
resigning our players or re-signing our players?We have those players here that are up for new contracts, which will cause the team to shell out big dollar amounts. With that said, it seems that there's that moment when said player doesn't play to expectations of the contract money, causing fans to be in uproar saying "why did we even sign him, WE OVERSPENT!" Why does this happen, I mean we can't have players on 1 year deals. I think we need to just go with the flow, and once the players contract is coming to an end, then that'll be a good time to discuss whether the player lived up to his contract and needs a new one or not!
We can all name some players in need of new deals, we WANT them to stay here, but as soon as they have a bad year, the negativity comes. Please give your thoughts on this, and opinions