sonnyboy
Benched
- Messages
- 7,357
- Reaction score
- 0
10. We can criticize Tony Romo's girlfriends and golfing and lack of demonstrative leadership all we want, but only a handful of quarterbacks can make the play he produced in the first quarter. Pressured in the pocket, Romo slid left, bounced right, protectected the ball with both hands and eventually - while running, mind you - lofted a perfect pass to a streaking Jason Witten inside the 10. The dude is an elite quarterback when improvising.
I watched a replay of this play like 10 times looking for a one very specific thing - just how dangerous a pass was it. Was there a real chance an interception.
It did look a little risky at first glance. On further review, not at all.
It is a perfect example of just what makes Romo so special. Few if any other QBs have the instincts, reflexes and most importantly balls to make that play.
What suprises me the most is that I'm not surprised. He's good for at least one of these type plays almost every game. I've come to expect it and that's a good thing.
That's why a few misconceptions of Romo developed soon after he hit the scene and to a certain extent have lingered.
1) He's lucky. He makes a few too many of plays successfully that appear fortunate.
2) He's reckless. Far too often these type unorthodox plays appear risky.
They're not as risky as they appear and are certainly not lucky. Something I heard him once say in an interview has stuck with me.
And that's that he plays out many of these type scenarios over and over in his head.
It's not luck. It's opportunity meeting preparation.
I watched a replay of this play like 10 times looking for a one very specific thing - just how dangerous a pass was it. Was there a real chance an interception.
It did look a little risky at first glance. On further review, not at all.
It is a perfect example of just what makes Romo so special. Few if any other QBs have the instincts, reflexes and most importantly balls to make that play.
What suprises me the most is that I'm not surprised. He's good for at least one of these type plays almost every game. I've come to expect it and that's a good thing.
That's why a few misconceptions of Romo developed soon after he hit the scene and to a certain extent have lingered.
1) He's lucky. He makes a few too many of plays successfully that appear fortunate.
2) He's reckless. Far too often these type unorthodox plays appear risky.
They're not as risky as they appear and are certainly not lucky. Something I heard him once say in an interview has stuck with me.
And that's that he plays out many of these type scenarios over and over in his head.
It's not luck. It's opportunity meeting preparation.