***Rip Garrett Thread***

I understand we don't have a great running game but maybe romo wouldn't throw 3 picks if we actually ran the ball. For a guy who played with emmitt smith he sure as hell doesn't know how to run the ball effectively
 
rcaldw;4156542 said:
Honestly. I don't have time for you guys. Enjoy yourselves!! :)

Later.

Good move.

You're getting clobbered here.

Best to cut and run.

:eekmouse:
 
stasheroo;4156521 said:
Yeah, thats' what lost this team a 24-point lead and the game today - 'agenda'.

:rolleyes:

The only agenda I see at work is the ridiculousness of people springing to Garrett's defense.

Too bad Garrett didn't have the chance to work with Parcells.

Maybe Big Bill putting him over his knee would have put some coaching fundamentals into him.

No only Rediculousness I see is trying to pin this one on Garrett. It was a Romo loss pure and simple. Team played great except for one Romo. Unfortunately, he is the one who decides who wins and loses.

Belichek didn't become a genious inspite of Brady. Funny how his geniousness didn't work when he had Bledsoe at helm.:rolleyes:
 
How on the face of the earth do you have 47 passes and 27 runs and you were winning by 24 IN THE SECOND HALF. You know you have a turnover prone QB...How about not put him in the position to have those mistakes. God JG is such a moron I can't even believe it. Literally the only thing they could have done is throw the ball and commit turnovers. Sure enough....

He makes me so furious.
 
rcaldw;4156449 said:
I think you might want to rethink what you just wrote. If you wish to call me a clown fine. If you wish to use homosexual references, not fine.

The truth is what I've said. A lot of the fan base on this board doesn't know a thing about football, and you lead the pack.


Whatever you infer that as is your own sensitivity issue. Clearly, you have some sort of agenda if you're going to vehemently support Garrett on here and berate anyone who takes issue with some of his coaching decisions. The infatuation is cute, but I don't act like you know more about football just because you love Garrett.
 
dboy214;4156563 said:
chill out guys, romo did throw 5 tds today.

Dude, we just watched the biggest collaspe in franchise history thanks to a gunslinger QB and his ******** OC.
 
RCowboyFan;4156581 said:
No only Rediculousness I see is trying to pin this one on Garrett. It was a Romo loss pure and simple. Team played great except for one Romo. Unfortunately, he is the one who decides who wins and loses.

Belichek didn't become a genious inspite of Brady. Funny how his geniousness didn't work when he had Bledsoe at helm.:rolleyes:



Only Jason Garrett sees a 20+ lead and goes out in the shotgun.
 
Beast_from_East;4156592 said:
Dude, we just watched the biggest collaspe in franchise history thanks to a gunslinger QB and his ******** OC.
you didn't get it.
 
dboy214;4156617 said:
you didn't get it.
You're going to repeat it thoughout several threads anyway. He'll eventually get it.
 
Cochese;4156613 said:
Only Jason Garrett sees a 20+ lead and goes out in the shotgun.
Watch Patriots still throwing with 30+ points lead and on shotgun..... :rolleyes: Talk about ********....and Selective memory.
 
cbow44;4156204 said:
you and people like you are morons. we need a football IQ test so you morons can talk football. there is 5 min gone in the second half and you want us to do nothing but run the rest of the game.

LOL. Exactly.What do you do when your hero gives away 21 points in what would have been a blowout? Blame Garrett. We were only UP due to our passing O. Punting the ball after 3 runs would have also given them the ball. You cant play to not lose in the 3rd quarter. Drama queens. Vertical? Werent they both passes in the flat?
 
like i said, id love to see Romo with a competant offensive coordinator. Jason and his awful schemes are stale and have been figured out.
 
rcaldw;4156431 said:
How about lets pay attention to the details of each game. When Garrett deserves to be ripped, lets rip him. I'll help you. But to rip him today is just hindsight is 20/20 stuff. This one is on a very undisciplined QB.

How can any head coach justify letting a single player sink the team?

You really feel that Red deserves no blame at all?
 
RCowboyFan;4156647 said:
Watch Patriots still throwing with 30+ points lead and on shotgun..... :rolleyes: Talk about ********....and Selective memory.



the team that blew an epic lead last week, that team, right?
 
RCowboyFan;4156647 said:
Watch Patriots still throwing with 30+ points lead and on shotgun..... :rolleyes: Talk about ********....and Selective memory.

Prior to last weekend, the Pats really never blew 20+ point leads with Brady, so they could do what they wanted. I guarantee more people on NE were calling for the run after that 4 INT collapse there also...
 
RCowboyFan;4156581 said:
No only Rediculousness I see is trying to pin this one on Garrett. It was a Romo loss pure and simple. Team played great except for one Romo. Unfortunately, he is the one who decides who wins and loses.

Garrett called those pass plays with a 24 point lead - Garrett.

Belichek didn't become a genious inspite of Brady. Funny how his geniousness didn't work when he had Bledsoe at helm.:rolleyes:

Are you actually going to mention Belichick and Garrett in the same post?

:laugh2:
 
RCowboyFan;4156647 said:
Watch Patriots still throwing with 30+ points lead and on shotgun..... :rolleyes: Talk about ********....and Selective memory.

Yea, we have Tom Brady at QB.


Good comparison.:rolleyes:
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,007
Messages
14,506,175
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top