Rodney Harrison

How can anyone take seriously anything Harrison says.:confused::rolleyes:

As soon as he opens his mouth you know he's two sandwiches shy of a picnic. Oh, and by the way , someone tell his mother to buy him a suit that fits.:banghead:
 
Terence Newman700;4192921 said:
What an idiot...Torry Holt makes sense and not just because he is saying we will win the division. He actually speaks facts to back it up

All Harrison can say..."i don't trust romo" "they lost to New England" "they are the 3rd best team in the NFC East"

I pretty much agreed with everything Harrison said he nailed most of it. Naturally you think he's an idiot because his opinion didn't favor the Cowboys. You sound like a typical cheerleading FAN who refuses to be objective about the team. Naturally you thought Holt made sense because he's saying the Cowboys will win the division. :rolleyes: It's obvious Garrett doesn't trust Romo he made that perfectly clear last Sunday against NE open your eyes! Garrett top can say he trusts Romo all he wants because it's the only thing he can say. I don't care how many turnovers Romo has Garrett will continue to spin he has all the confidence in the world in him.

He was scared to death to allow Romo to throw the ball on that second to last drive against NE in fear of an int possibly a pick six. I'm sure he'd been having nightmares of those since the Detroit game. He hardly had Romo throw to the endzone on any of the Cowboys redzone opportunities in fear Romo would turn the ball over instead he played for FG's.

Some of you need to take off your rose colored glasses and stop ripping everyone who doesn't think the Cowboys are great and start coming to grips with Romo and where this team is at the present time.
 
Fletch;4193213 said:
And of course if anything is somewhat positive and not spun in a negative light, then it's unacceptable to you. :rolleyes:

No, that's the difference between you and I. I respect objectivity, whether it reflects positively or poorly on the Cowboys. You simply want one side of it; sunshine blown up your rear.
 
KJJ;4193570 said:
I pretty much agreed with everything Harrison said he nailed most of it. Naturally you think he's an idiot because his opinion didn't favor the Cowboys. You sound like a typical cheerleading FAN who refuses to be objective about the team. Naturally you thought Holt made sense because he's saying the Cowboys will win the division. :rolleyes: It's obvious Garrett doesn't trust Romo he made that perfectly clear last Sunday against NE open your eyes! Garrett top can say he trusts Romo all he wants because it's the only thing he can say. I don't care how many turnovers Romo has Garrett will continue to spin he has all the confidence in the world in him.

He was scared to death to allow Romo to throw the ball on that second to last drive against NE in fear of an int possibly a pick six. I'm sure he'd been having nightmares of those since the Detroit game. He hardly had Romo throw to the endzone on any of the Cowboys redzone opportunities in fear Romo would turn the ball over instead he played for FG's.

Some of you need to take off your rose colored glasses and stop ripping everyone who doesn't think the Cowboys are great and start coming to grips with Romo and where this team is at the present time.

If you are atuned to the tea leaves as you cry foul against another for, and not sticking to your readings for YOURSELF...then you might even further deduce that all blame will also now be Romo's alone, and that for a period of time at least, Jason Garrett has the opportunity to take some real gambles now...and leave the blame upon ROMO.

Sorry, Charlie, Jason Garrett would FIRST get another quarterback if he truely just didn't trust Romo.

But as to analytical inproprieties or being appropriate, read the above post by realtick...
 
CCBoy;4193610 said:
If you are atuned to the tea leaves as you cry foul against another for, and not sticking to your readings for YOURSELF...then you might even further deduce that all blame will also now be Romo's alone, and that for a period of time at least, Jason Garrett has the opportunity to take some real gambles now...and leave the blame upon ROMO.

Could you run that by me again? :rolleyes: Hopefully one of these days you'll learn how to formulate a post that makes at least a little sense.
 
realtick;4193583 said:
No, that's the difference between you and I. I respect objectivity, whether it reflects positively or poorly on the Cowboys. You simply want one side of it; sunshine blown up your rear.

You mad? :laugh2:

It's more than just me that feel like cheering the team on rather than *****in and moanin 100% of the time. But hey, whatever helps ya sleep at night, partner!
 
Fletch;4193647 said:
You mad? :laugh2:

It's more than just me that feel like cheering the team on rather than *****in and moanin 100% of the time. But hey, whatever helps ya sleep at night, partner!

You hurt?

Scratch that. I know you're hurt, because you keep following me around threads sniping.

Lol, I think it's obvious what gets you get through your day.
 
KJJ;4193635 said:
Could you run that by me again? :rolleyes: Hopefully one of these days you'll learn how to formulate a post that makes at least a little sense.

You'll be able to make sense about the time you quit being a dumb arse...


Tea leaves imply projection based upon imagination, not direct comparisons.

You limited your 'make - believe' to blame on Romo...and following along your nany too shoe excuse, then JG would now be justified, due to guilt association with your tea leave reading, to challenge ANY future situation with a gamble. As following your line of 'reasoning' now, Romo would receive future blame. That being established by your tea leave reading of why Jason Garrett then chose to run, instead of throwing with a short time on the clock.

Thus endeth the readings from the ancient crypts...run along and return to playing in the streets now. As you didn't want to discuss play effectiveness and evaluate what caused error in specific play failures.

No, you still hang supposed objectivity upon labels...and those never have meandered far from hypocracy. Maybe you should instead invest in a Ouija Board to decipher what is at play.:muttley:

Oh, and burn barrells have deep social value...
 
CCBoy;4193680 said:
You'll be able to make sense about the time you quit being a dumb arse...


Tea leaves imply projection based upon imagination, not direct comparisons.

You limited your 'make - believe' to blame on Romo...and following along your nany too shoe excuse, then JG would now be justified, due to guilt association with your tea leave reading, to challenge ANY future situation with a gamble. As following your line of 'reasoning' now, Romo would receive future blame. That being established by your tea leave reading of why Jason Garrett then chose to run, instead of throwing with a short time on the clock.

Thus endeth the readings from the ancient crypts...run along and return to playing in the streets now. As you didn't want to discuss play effectiveness and evaluate what caused error in specific play failures.

No, you still hang supposed objectivity upon labels...and those never have meandered far from hypocracy. Maybe you should instead invest in a Ouija Board to decipher what is at play.:muttley:

Oh, and burn barrells have deep social value...

Anyone who attempts to decipher your senseless drivel knows you don't have a clue. Dude this sounds like some extremely bad poetry from a depressed drunk cuddling up to a bottle of Jack."If you are atuned to the tea leaves as you cry foul against another for, and not sticking to your readings for YOURSELF...then you might even further deduce that all blame will also now be Romo's alone, and that for a period of time at least, Jason Garrett has the opportunity to take some real gambles now...and leave the blame upon ROMO." :laugh2:
 
CCBoy;4193680 said:
No, you still hang supposed objectivity upon labels...and those never have meandered far from hypocracy. Maybe you should instead invest in a Ouija Board to decipher what is at play.:muttley:

Maybe you should invest in a few therapy sessions and a course in English.
 
KJJ;4193685 said:
Anyone who attempts to decipher your senseless drivel knows you don't have a clue. Dude this sounds like some extremely bad poetry from a depressed drunk cuddling up to a bottle of Jack."If you are atuned to the tea leaves as you cry foul against another for, and not sticking to your readings for YOURSELF...then you might even further deduce that all blame will also now be Romo's alone, and that for a period of time at least, Jason Garrett has the opportunity to take some real gambles now...and leave the blame upon ROMO." :laugh2:

Wonder why you run to a Ripple quote...?

YOU placed blame on Romo. Have memory problems?

Now try not to be anal retentive long enough to follow the bouncing ball:

If Romo is to blame, then Jason Garrett is off the hook for selections. (from YOUR point)

Now, Jason Garrett could THEN be absolved of any FUTURE guilt if he gambles with TONY ROMO. As Jerry Jones stated that play selection was conservative in the New England Game.

Now tell your probation officer to check that burn barrell ankle bracelot, as you are meandering too far from your burn barrell house arrest.

That's sufficient explanation for your mouth tremblings and burn barrell acclaim. Have that ankle bracelot checked, although....and run along. :pee:
 
CCBoy;4193702 said:
Now tell your probation officer to check that burn barrell ankle bracelot, as you are meandering too far from your burn barrell house arrest.

That's sufficient explanation for your mouth tremblings and burn barrell acclaim. Have that ankle bracelot checked, although....and run along. :pee:

You need to get back to your speech therapy class and stop making yourself look silly. Anyone who's attempted to discuss a football topic with you knows your elevator is stuck between floors. Go find an online therapy group maybe someone there can make sense of your drivel.
 
KJJ;4193715 said:
You need to get back to your speech therapy class and stop making yourself look silly. Anyone who's attempted to discuss a football topic with you knows your elevator is stuck between floors. Go find an online therapy group maybe someone there can make sense of your drivel.

You never attempted discussion on topic, so if your own arm aches from patting yourself on the back, then invest in an over-the-counter ointment for muscle soreness. But simple talk is understandable, and not everyone has a problem understanding directions of talk. As to standards, establish merit of your own based upon topic, or you are what you state. Self serving, a small step from braggart, and full of hot wind.

But you are attempting to establish merit beyond topic, as you nowhere approached topic, and fled into a disccourse on your own accomplishment in literary applications. Try again...and come off your ingrained high horse onto topic.

Don't like how I state something, stay out of a discussion that you are merely a rock chunker, and poor at that. Even if you attempt to look pompous or raise a pinkie finger before tossing.
 
CCBoy;4193732 said:
Don't like how I state something, stay out of a discussion that you are merely a rock chunker, and poor at that. Even if you attempt to look pompous or raise a pinkie finger before tossing.

You are one strange puppy. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :laugh2:

I've attempted to have discussions with you in the past and you turn everything into a mass pile of senseless drivel that lasts for days. Go waste someone else's time and see how long they want to rummage through your jumbled up pile of crap.
 
KJJ;4193770 said:
You are one strange puppy. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :laugh2:

I've attempted to have discussions with you in the past and you turn everything into a mass pile of senseless drivel that lasts for days. Go waste someone else's time and see how long they want to rummage through your jumbled up pile of crap.

You're the one keeping talk in this type of venue...so continue tuting your own horn. I'm still here to talk football, and always return to such. But am not the least bit impressed by an inflated and pompous stance. I was a soldier first, and don't mind mixing it up, that is what you really want. But I still prefer a football topic, and really don't have a problem in expression. Don't like the words used, although, then move on...:rolleyes: as ignoring someone else's rights doesn't move YOU an inch closer to right.
 
CCBoy;4193775 said:
You're the one keeping talk in this type of venue...so continue tuting your own horn. I'm still here to talk football, and always return to such. But am not the least bit impressed by an inflated and pompous stance. I was a soldier first, and don't mind mixing it up, that is what you really want. But I still prefer a football topic, and really don't have a problem in expression. Don't like the words used, although, then move on...:rolleyes: as ignoring someone else's rights doesn't move YOU an inch closer to right.

I must be tooting my horn because you keep following me around like the pied piper. By the way it's spelled "tooting." If you were a solder you were probably the first one on record to be dishonorably discharged just for your inability to communicate intelligently. lol It's clear to anyone who's attempted to decipher your drivel that your driveway doesn't come close to reaching the road. I've wasted a lot of time attempting to talk football with you in the past and anyone who has knows your lost in a world of jumbled up linguistics. Until you can learn how to formulate a post this all you're going to get from me I'm not about to take you seriously.
 
KJJ;4193800 said:
I must be tooting my horn because you keep following me around like the pied piper. By the way it's spelled "tooting." If you were a solder you were probably the first one on record to be dishonorably discharged just for your inability to communicate intelligently. lol It's clear to anyone who's attempted to decipher your drivel that your driveway doesn't come close to reaching the road. I've wasted a lot of time attempting to talk football with you in the past and anyone who has knows your lost in a world of jumbled up linguistics. Until you can learn how to formulate a post this all you're going to get from me I'm not about to take you seriously.

Talk about queer steer...no one has to follow yourself around. You keep coming back with the same, tired, insult and spin on that. Not hard to keep pointing that out as well. And you just proved the argument for your own vanity aspect, fully, now. Carry on...and your sense of serious is humorous.:shatfan: Who gives a flip what you take serious. What's up, is a directional imput...and you can locate your own spot. Figure it out, but I bet you don't even have a clue.


Much less where the team is headed WITH the blessings of all three: Jerry Jones, Jason Garrett, and Rob Ryan...which is exactly where YOU fell out of this discussion. :eek:
 
CCBoy;4193816 said:
Talk about queer steer...no one has to follow yourself around. You keep coming back with the same, tired, insult and spin on that. Not hard to keep pointing that out as well. And you just proved the argument for your own vanity aspect, fully, now. Carry on...and your sense of serious is humorous.:shatfan: Who gives a flip what you take serious. What's up, is a directional imput...and you can locate your own spot. Figure it out, but I bet you don't even have a clue.


Much less where the team is headed WITH the blessings of all three: Jerry Jones, Jason Garrett, and Rob Ryan...which is exactly where YOU fell out of this discussion. :eek:

You're the one who started this by responding to a comment I made to someone else and calling me a dumb arse. The insults started with you like they always do when someone comments on your use of the English language. You would think you would be use to the comments by now or at least made some changes to the way you post.

You're starting to get offensive with some of your comments my advice would be to calm down and stop allowing me to get under your thin skin by continuing to walk in exposing your inability to formulate a sentence.
 
KJJ;4193857 said:
You're the one who started this by responding to a comment I made to someone else and calling me a dumb arse. The insults started with you like they always do when someone comments on your use of the English language. You would think you would be use to the comments by now or at least made some changes to the way you post.

You're starting to get offensive with some of your comments my advice would be to calm down and stop allowing me to get under your thin skin by continuing to walk in exposing your inability to formulate a sentence.

Dingle butt, all sensitive? Here is the punch line, since you enlisted in sick, lame, AND lazy:

'And the issue at the forefront has become that the head coach, Jason Garrett, who doubles as the offensive coordinator, suddenly doesn't trust the quarterback, Tony Romo, who nevertheless was asked to throw the ball 41 times against the Patriots, so I'm guessing we shouldn't worry so much about that fact. It became an issue to the point both parties were asked about this, eliciting predictable answers of implicitly trusting each other.

But if you want answers, if you really want the truth - if you can handle the truth - then the truth of the matter is Garrett, in that particular game, where even Cowboys owner Jerry Jones admitted, "We really did get what I called big-boy-ed, putting a lot of pressure on the interior of our line," didn't trust his offensive line.'*

And to the point, YOU COULDN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH... :D


*http://www.dallascowboys.com/news/news.cfm?id=28E0CE9B-A17A-9FB2-476A311E4C711AEA
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,006
Messages
14,506,050
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top