What's the message? That they will tolerate some drug use but not all drug use or crime by different levels of players.
It's best not to have a rigid policy with these things. It will only come back to bite you.
They handled McClain pretty well. They gave him playing time incentives and signed plenty of depth. If he plays and helps then he plays and helps. He did save our bacon last year.
Will be interesting to see how THC use is treated once it becomes legal nationwide, as it inevitably will. We got past prohibition, and weed will also eventually prevail.
Of course, the intemperate use of alcohol is terribly destructive, and employers can screen for impaired workers who can drink liberally on their own time.
We currently do not have the routine quantitative testing methodologies for assessing the longer acting presence and relative impairment levels of THC.
In the future, I would expect that a minimal allowable non-impaired level will be determined, which will permit a person to, for instance, smoke the evening before work on the following morning, and be judged acceptable.
There certainly will be employers, however, that choose not to accept
any level of positive test; this will be challenged if the substance is made universally legal and research establishes an acceptable level of content.
Times, they are a changin'.