Romo and Dak based on Raw Ability

Can't say this isn't a valid point, if he was disagreeing with the post he didn't read
Let me ask you this how much time would you dedicate to posters who have attempted to troll you for numerous years now? I could easily go back and forth but that just feeds them. For instance he’s currently upset because I didn’t read his troll job. And I won’t lol.
 
I want to make it clear that I have no desire to get involved in people's chronic feuds. A statement was made to me. I responded with my POV from my experiences. I'm not taking sides.

I shouldn't have even made the highlighted comment I made. I'm out.
 
Sorry, I just have to point out this gem. You say that with a straight face but completely ignore that this is what I was responding too.

So. WHO derailed this thread? This is CLASSIC tmc and is exactly why you draw the attention you do.

You really think a random group of completely unrelated people just decided to pick on you for no reason?
That post was about Steve the Cowboy who took a shot at me when I was minding my business. Which is what you guys do. I’m having a debate with @Runwildboys and so far you, @5Stars and @SteveTheCowboy aka Cowboylover all have joined in…..with nothing concerning the topic at hand. I’ve engaged in debates with him far longer then all three of you guys so I think he has a better idea of me then Curly, Larry and Moe.
 
Let me ask you this how much time would you dedicate to posters who have attempted to troll you for numerous years now? I could easily go back and forth but that just feeds them. For instance he’s currently upset because I didn’t read his troll job. And I won’t lol.
BOLD> Oh no, now he is going to be so depressed that you did not read it.

Shame on you for doing that to your fellow human being!
 
TMC is like all Dak stans - repeating the same impotent attempted diminishments of Romo, e.g., "he had 13 pro-bowlers" and the ever useless, invented statistic of "win or go home games" so they can add those three losses onto "Romo's playoff win loss record" so it looks worse than Dak's worse playoff record, and more importantly, worse choking in them. Four of those pro-bowlers were one time (one was the kicker). Two them were over six time pro-bowlers, all-pros and future HOFs (Ware and Witten). The others ranged from two-time pro-bowlers (Terrance Newman), and others with a number between the latter and the former like Romo himself (four times). Romo knew how to win with the game on the line: he did it 29 times and had the highest 4th quarter QB rating among all QBs during his time as starter, the very opposite of choker. Unfortunately, he failed to help the team win games just like ALL QBs do when they needed to be won, and couldn't get over the playoff hump when the competition is tougher. There's a difference between that and looking like a deer in headlights.
 
Yep. I respectfully disagree. You’ve literally been replying the same way to me for 3 or 4 plus years now. Are you honestly gonna tell me that this post doesn't reflect the same belittling and disparaging comments that all the other posts have? This one is gonna be different lol?

You mean to tell me you aren’t gonna accuse me of gaslighting you and taking you down a rabbit hole lol?
It's all me? You have no input in the dynamic? Again, classic tmc. Zero self reflection. All blame and denial to paint yourself as the victim.

Gaslighting and deflection are you primary defense mechanisms. So yea, chances are pretty good.
 
Let me ask you this how much time would you dedicate to posters who have attempted to troll you for numerous years now? I could easily go back and forth but that just feeds them. For instance he’s currently upset because I didn’t read his troll job. And I won’t lol.
Master Class in victimship.

Since you brought it up in your last response I will go ahead and point out your latest attempt at gaslighting.

"For instance he’s currently upset because I didn’t read his troll job. And I won’t lol."

You try to set the false narrative that I am upset that you didn't read my post. You also set the false narrative that it was a "troll job". Both of those are false, yet your argument is based on them. An argument which just happens to set the narrative that you are the victim.

That false narrative setting/redefining of reality is a form of gaslighting.
 
TMC is like all Dak stans - repeating the same impotent attempted diminishments of Romo, e.g., "he had 13 pro-bowlers" and the ever useless, invented statistic of "win or go home games" so they can add those three losses onto "Romo's playoff win loss record" so it looks worse than Dak's worse playoff record, and more importantly, worse choking in them. Four of those pro-bowlers were one time (one was the kicker). Two them were over six time pro-bowlers, all-pros and future HOFs (Ware and Witten). The others ranged from two-time pro-bowlers (Terrance Newman), and others with a number between the latter and the former like Romo himself (four times). Romo knew how to win with the game on the line: he did it 29 times and had the highest 4th quarter QB rating among all QBs during his time as starter, the very opposite of choker. Unfortunately, he failed to help the team win games just like ALL QBs do when they needed to be won, and couldn't get over the playoff hump when the competition is tougher. There's a difference between that and looking like a deer in headlights.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
 
Master Class in victimship.

Since you brought it up in your last response I will go ahead and point out your latest attempt at gaslighting.

"For instance he’s currently upset because I didn’t read his troll job. And I won’t lol."

You try to set the false narrative that I am upset that you didn't read my post. You also set the false narrative that it was a "troll job". Both of those are false, yet your argument is based on them. An argument which just happens to set the narrative that you are the victim.

That false narrative setting/redefining of reality is a form of gaslighting.
I know why 5 star and Steve hold a grudge…what triggers you? Is it me being a Dak fan? Or something else? Let’s get to the bottom of this.

:)
 
It's all me? You have no input in the dynamic? Again, classic tmc. Zero self reflection. All blame and denial to paint yourself as the victim.

Gaslighting and deflection are you primary defense mechanisms. So yea, chances are pretty good.
The irony of this is I never reach out to you guys. You guys reply to me and claim I’m gaslighting and deflecting you lol. Make it make sense sir.
 
I know why 5 star and Steve hold a grudge…what triggers you? Is it me being a Dak fan? Or something else? Let’s get to the bottom of this.

:)
I'm certain I have told you before. You probably didn't read it.

I can't say for sure but I'd bet my lunch money that either of those guys hold any grudge against you. That's just more gaslighting by you to play the victim.

I bet they, like me, just see you for what you are and not what you pretend to be.
 
I'm certain I have told you before. You probably didn't read it.

I can't say for sure but I'd bet my lunch money that either of those guys hold any grudge against you. That's just more gaslighting by you to play the victim.

I bet they, like me, just see you for what you are and not what you pretend to be.
So in gaslighting you and playing victim….dont those terms contradict each other? :laugh:

So your issue with me and why you always seek my posts out despite me gaslighting you and playing victim is because you see me for who I am and not who I pretend to be? And what exactly am I lol?

And you’ve never told me before lol.
 
The irony of this is I never reach out to you guys. You guys reply to me and claim I’m gaslighting and deflecting you lol. Make it make sense sir.
Ahhh. another well worn weird tactic you employ. The old "I wasn't talking to you" shtick.

And then some gaslighting about gaslighting.

You poor thing.
 
Ahhh. another well worn weird tactic you employ. The old "I wasn't talking to you" shtick.

And then some gaslighting about gaslighting.

You poor thing.
Are you gonna answer the question or once ignore it? Notice I’ve asked you questions and you pivot without answering them. Great tactic. I’m not interested in going back and forth if you aren’t going to answer the questions this is tired.
 
So in gaslighting you and playing victim….dont those terms contradict each other? :laugh:
No. Quite often, but not always, they go hand in hand.

So your issue with me and why you always seek my posts out despite me gaslighting you and playing victim is because you see me for who I am and not who I pretend to be?
Another example of gaslighting. "always seek out my posts". No. I never seek out your posts. I open a thread and am bombarded by your posts. I never have to seek them out. You try real hard to portray me as a "stalker" who "seeks out you posts" with no apparent regard for the public nature of the forum.

Probably choose not to read this one I'm guessing. lol
 
Are you gonna answer the question or once ignore it? Notice I’ve asked you questions and you pivot without answering them. Great tactic. I’m not interested in going back and forth if you aren’t going to answer the questions this is tired.
Which question did I miss? I'm happy to answer it.
 
Which question did I miss? I'm happy to answer it.
I’ve asked you what’s the issue….I’ve also asked you if you feel im gaslighting you and playing victim why are you engaging with me? I’m not seeking your posts like in this thread I’m talking to a completely different poster here you replied to me just for me to gaslight you?
 
There's a very calming feature here on CZ. It's an "ignore" button. Just press it, and anyone who makes you so aggravated that you feel the need to fill pages of a thread with back and forth bickering just...goes away.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,117
Messages
13,789,689
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top