Romo and Dak based on Raw Ability

[TheMarathonContinues]

No. Quite often, but not always, they go hand in hand.


Another example of gaslighting. "always seek out my posts". No. I never seek out your posts. I open a thread and am bombarded by your posts. I never have to seek them out. You try real hard to portray me as a "stalker" who "seeks out you posts" with no apparent regard for the public nature of the forum.

Probably choose not to read this one I'm guessing. lol

So how would you want me to say it? If you aren’t always seeking my posts what’s a better way to say it to where you don’t think I’m gaslighting you?

 

[AtomicDog]

Dak made it easy for Romo to retire.

 

[Vtwin]

I’ve asked you what’s the issue…

And I explained that I see through you. You draw attention with the way you operate. There is no "issue". That is just doing what you do. It's more like you fascinate me. You are entertaining, not upsetting.

I’ve also asked you if you feel im gaslighting you and playing victim why are you engaging with me?

I answered that as well. You can either scroll back or just see above.

I’m not seeking your posts like in this thread I’m talking to a completely different poster here you replied to me just for me to gaslight you?

No. I replied to you because I had thoughts on what YOU posted in this public forum. It is very interesting that you don't factor in exactly what you posted to draw me in. Rather you try and paint the false narrative that you were just skipping along having a nice conversation about football and mean old Me came in hot to attack the poor victim, tmc.

Again, your weird tactics such as the constant gaslighting and deflection (aka rabbit holing) don't upset me. No matter how many times you say it, it still won't be true.

 

[Runwildboys]

Dak made it easy for Romo to retire.

Injuries made it easy for Romo to retire.

 

[Vtwin]

There's a very calming feature here on CZ. It's an "ignore" button. Just press it, and anyone who makes you so aggravated that you feel the need to fill pages of a thread with back and forth bickering just...goes away.

Come on man. It's a Sunday in early March and it's in a Romo vs Dak thread. At the end of it at that.

My apologies just the same.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

And I explained that I see through you. You draw attention with the way you operate. There is no "issue". That is just doing what you do. It's more like you fascinate me. You are entertaining, not upsetting.


I answered that as well. You can either scroll back or just see above.

No. I replied to you because I had thoughts on what YOU posted in this public forum. It is very interesting that you don't factor in exactly what you posted to draw me in. Rather you try and paint the false narrative that you were just skipping along having a nice conversation about football and mean old Me came in hot to attack the poor victim, tmc.

Again, your weird tactics such as the constant gaslighting and deflection (aka rabbit holing) don't upset me. No matter how many times you say it, it still won't be true.

Ok. Not sure what you want from me like I said I don’t seek your posts and I certainly wouldn’t waste time or effort gaslighting anyone. But it is what it is. I’ve said my peace.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Dak made it easy for Romo to retire.

Good point

 

[Vtwin]

So how would you want me to say it? If you aren’t always seeking my posts what’s a better way to say it to where you don’t think I’m gaslighting you?

Seriously? I don't know if you just don't understand what you're reading or if you're trolling me with a ridiculous question.

The obvious answer is to not create the false narrative that I am "seeking out your posts", or calling me a "stalker" to begin with.

I am going paraphrase CCboy here and say, There is no right way to say the wrong thing.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Seriously? I don't know if you just don't understand what you're reading or if you're trolling me with a ridiculous question.

The obvious answer is to not create the false narrative that I am "seeking out your posts", or calling me a "stalker" to begin with.

I am going paraphrase CCboy here and say, There is no right way to say the wrong thing.

Ok.

 

[5Stars]

I know why 5 star and Steve hold a grudge…what triggers you? Is it me being a Dak fan? Or something else? Let’s get to the bottom of this.

You care to explain what this "grudge" that you are talking about me holding is? That gaslight shines bright in your world. So, tell me about the grudge without the "rabbit hole" crap you pull.

 

[5Stars]

I'm certain I have told you before. You probably didn't read it.

I can't say for sure but I'd bet my lunch money that either of those guys hold any grudge against you. That's just more gaslighting by you to play the victim.

I bet they, like me, just see you for what you are and not what you pretend to be.

lol...I just posted about this before I read this post. Typical TMC, no life.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

You care to explain what this "grudge" that you are talking about me holding is? That gaslight shines bright in your world. So, tell me about the grudge without the "rabbit hole" crap you pull.

I thought you were upset because of that time I said you weren’t allowed 50 feet from schools?

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Yet

lol...I just posted about this before I read this post. Typical TMC, no life.

Yet your whole existence on this site is dedicated to me lol. The marathon continues…..RIP Nip

 

[Vtwin]

Not sure what you want from me

I don't want anything from you.

I certainly wouldn’t waste time or effort gaslighting anyone

It takes no more time or effort than replying in any other way. It comes very naturally for some. It is normal in their minds.

Psychology is some crazy stuff. Heck of a rabbit hole to go down.

 

[jterrell]

This is the lowest IQ thread on here this week.
I am an AI engineer for Dell.
This is not how you use AI.

You have to provide the datasets to be analyzed at bare minimum.

 

[5Stars]

I thought you were upset because of that time I said you weren’t allowed 50 feet from schools?

You think some juvenile insult makes me hold some kind of grudge?

You need help.

 

[Runwildboys]

Come on man. It's a Sunday in early March and it's in a Romo vs Dak thread. At the end of it at that.

My apologies just the same.

No need to apologize to me. Just giving options.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

This is the lowest IQ thread on here this week.
I am an AI engineer for Dell.
This is not how you use AI.

You have to provide the datasets to be analyzed at bare minimum.

 

[Vtwin]

Ok.

 

[plasticman]

It’s worth pointing out that your list of top 5 passer rating is all QBs outside of Rogers drafted around or within ten years ago. Perhaps that reflects a change in the game more so than QB play. But that’s irrelevant to what coddled means.

Just because I didn’t give a definition doesn’t mean I didn’t consider the one given correctly. You think Romo not throwing a pass in three years in a real game means he was coddled?

There are multiple synonyms for the term: pampered, spoiled, babied, catered to, favored, etc.

All of those terms imply someone who didn’t have to earn his way into his position, the exact opposite of Romo.

You used the term as if Parcells was just favoring him as some kind of pet favorite and he wasn’t actually learning, producing in practice, and earning the coach’s respect for nearly three years, which by all accounts, was the case, the exact opposite of being coddled.

I'm not implying that Romo didn't work his butt off every day. He earned the right to be on that team.

I am saying that there was a different level of expectation compared to most other QBs in the league. He was afforded a great deal of developmental time and they were more patient with him than any other QB I can ever think of.

He didn't play at all in his first two seasons because two guys that played more baseball than football were considered more advanced than him.

Dak's situation early in his career was a polar opposite to Tony's. Dak had to start day #1 his rookie season. Therefore, I think it is wholly unfair to compare their careers

It was also in this context that I referred to Romo as coddled. Certainly, compared to Dak's circumstances, Tony was deliberately protected from the physical and mental stress of being pushed onto the field with no NFL experience and a limited understanding of the offense and players.